COULD THIS BE THE NEXT QUEEN OF SCOTLAND? AS INDEPENDENCE LOOMS, WILL STUART CROWN RETURN?

A YES vote in September’s referendum on independence for Scotland could reawaken centuries old claims to the Scottish crown from members of the House of Stuart.

By: Ted Jeory Published: Thu, February 20, 2014

 Could the Duchess of Alba be the next Queen of Scotland? [WENN]

And an 87-year-old billionaire from Spain might argue she has the strongest claim.

For the Duchess of Alba is said to be one of two main contenders from the Stuart dynasty, whose Scottish monarchs transformed the country during their time in power.

While First Minister Alex Salmond insists Queen Elizabeth II would remain as head of state after a Yes vote, others are not so sure.

Some Scots look back fondly in the history books to their Stuart kings, the first of whom was Robert II in 1371.

By the 17th century, they ruled all of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland.

 
The Duchess of Alba is said to be one of two main contenders from the Stuart dynasty [PA]

The Duchess of Alba is the most titled nobleman or woman in the world, with more than 40 honours to her name

In 1603, James VI of Scotland became James I in London, unifying the two crowns. His son Charles I was executed and Charles II ascended to the thrones after Oliver Cromwell’s inter-regnum.

Charles II’s brother, Roman Catholic James II, then ruled until the Glorious Revolution saw him depart the British Isles.

The last Stuart monarch was Queen Anne, who died childless in 1714.

The Crown passed to the House of Hanover, but the Stuart line continued abroad.

Respected Telegraph commentator Peter Oborne wrote yesterday that David Cameron might throw a spanner in Scotalnd’s constitutional works.

He wrote: “Will the Queen be allowed to remain as Scottish monarch? “I have no doubt that the Queen herself would strongly prefer that she did.

“But it is not simply a matter for her. She is constitutionally obliged to take the advice of the Prime Minister, David Cameron.

“Cameron has already denied Scotland the pound sterling. He is entitled to deny the Scots the House of Windsor, especially since the Scots had their own separate monarch before James the VI and I unified the crowns of England and Scotland in 1603.”

The Duchess of Alba married a civil servant 24 years her junior in 2011 [WENN]

He said the closest in line is Franz, Duke of Bavaria, descended from Charles I’s youngest daughter Henrietta.

However, Franz, 81, who suffered at the hands of the Nazis, has always downplayed his interest in making any claims on the British or Scottish thrones.

Mr Oborne said that would leave the door open to the most titled woman in the world, the Duchess of Alba, whose official name is  Doña María del Rosario Cayetana Fitz-James Stuart y Silva, 18th Duchess of Alba de Tormes, Grandee of Spain.

As part of her name suggests, she too can trace her line back to the Stuart dynasty.

The Duchess of Alba is the most titled nobleman or woman in the world, with more than 40 honours to her name according to the Guinness Book of World Records.

The head of the 539-year-old House of Alba has been a duchess seven times over and enjoys the privilege of not having to kneel before the Pope.

 
Could Alex Salmond's independence plans have an unexpected knock-on effect? [PA]

The Duchess married in 2011 for the third time to a civil servant 24 years her junior.

The aristocrat is one of Spain's most famous and richest people, with her wealth estimated to be worth up to around £2.9 billion pounds.

The Duchess of Alba's wealth includes thousands of acres of land and hundreds of paintings and historical artefacts.

Among them are Christopher Columbus' first map of America and a first edition of classic novel Don Quixote.

 
The Duchess of Alba during her youth [REX]

Prior to her most recent marriage the Duchess of Alba's children tried to block her plans to wed Alfonso Díez.

It was reported that her claims to the House of Alba wealth would be lost if she managed the civil servant.

However, the Duchess of Alba bypassed her children's concerns by giving them their inheritance in advance.

She later claimed that she was still in control of her fortune.

She said: "I made the shareout because I wanted to. Nobody pressured me.

"Anyway, as long as I am alive everything remains in my hands."

Reflecting on her wealth, Mr Oborne joked: “If she became queen of an independent Scotland she would be in a position to bail out the Scottish government financially.”

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/460698/House-of-Stuart-s-Duchess-of-Alba-could-be-next-Queen-of-Scotland-after-independence-vote 

 

ARTICLE 6TER OF THE PARIS CONVENTION

Marks: Prohibitions concerning State Emblems, Official Hallmarks, and Emblems of Intergovernmental Organizations

(1) (a) The countries of the Union agree to refuse or to invalidate the registration, and to prohibit by appropriate measures the use, without authorization by the competent authorities, either as trademarks or as elements of trademarks, of armorial bearings, flags, and other State emblems, of the countries of the Union, official signs and hallmarks indicating control and warranty adopted by them, and any imitation from a heraldic point of view.

(b) The provisions of subparagraph (a), above, shall apply equally to armorial bearings, flags, other emblems, abbreviations, and names, of international intergovernmental organizations of which one or more countries of the Union are members, with the exception of armorial bearings, flags, other emblems, abbreviations, and names, that are already the subject of international agreements in force, intended to ensure their protection.

(c) No country of the Union shall be required to apply the provisions of subparagraph (b), above, to the prejudice of the owners of rights acquired in good faith before the entry into force, in that country, of this Convention. The countries of the Union shall not be required to apply the said provisions when the use or registration referred to in subparagraph (a), above, is not of such a nature as to suggest to the public that a connection exists between the organization concerned and the armorial bearings, flags, emblems, abbreviations, and names, or if such use or registration is probably not of such a nature as to mislead the public as to the existence of a connection between the user and the organization.

(2) Prohibition of the use of official signs and hallmarks indicating control and warranty shall apply solely in cases where the marks in which they are incorporated are intended to be used on goods of the same or a similar kind.

(3) (a) For the application of these provisions, the countries of the Union agree to communicate reciprocally, through the intermediary of the International Bureau, the list of State emblems, and official signs and hallmarks indicating control and warranty, which they desire, or may hereafter desire, to place wholly or within certain limits under the protection of this Article, and all subsequent modifications of such list. Each country of the Union shall in due course make available to the public the lists so communicated. Nevertheless such communication is not obligatory in respect of flags of States.

(b) The provisions of subparagraph (b) of paragraph (1) of this Article shall apply only to such armorial bearings, flags, other emblems, abbreviations, and names, of international intergovernmental organizations as the latter have communicated to the countries of the Union through the intermediary of the International Bureau.

(4) Any country of the Union may, within a period of twelve months from the receipt of the notification, transmit its objections, if any, through the intermediary of the International Bureau, to the country or international intergovernmental organization concerned.

(5) In the case of State flags, the measures prescribed by paragraph (1), above, shall apply solely to marks registered after November 6, 1925.

(6) In the case of State emblems other than flags, and of official signs and hallmarks of the countries of the Union, and in the case of armorial bearings, flags, other emblems, abbreviations, and names, of international intergovernmental organizations, these provisions shall apply only to marks registered more than two months after receipt of the communication provided for in paragraph (3), above.

(7) In cases of bad faith, the countries shall have the right to cancel even those marks incorporating State emblems, signs, and hallmarks, which were registered before November 6, 1925.

(8) Nationals of any country who are authorized to make use of the State emblems, signs, and hallmarks, of their country may use them even if they are similar to those of another country.

(9) The countries of the Union undertake to prohibit the unauthorized use in trade of the State armorial bearings of the other countries of the Union, when the use is of such a nature as to be misleading as to the origin of the goods.

(10) The above provisions shall not prevent the countries from exercising the right given in paragraph (3) of Article 6quinquies, Section B, to refuse or to invalidate the registration of marks incorporating, without authorization, armorial bearings, flags, other State emblems, or official signs and hallmarks adopted by a country of the Union, as well as the distinctive signs of international intergovernmental organizations referred to in paragraph (1), above".

http://www.wipo.int/article6ter/en/legal_texts/article_6ter.html

KURDAITCHA OR KURDAITCHA MAN

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kurdaitcha (or kurdaitcha man) is a ritual "executioner" in Australian Aboriginal culture (specifically the term comes from the Arrernte people). The word is also used by Europeans to refer to the shoes worn by the Kurdaitcha, woven of feathers and human hair and treated with blood. The Indigenous name for the shoes is interlinia in Northern Australia and intathurta in the South. Other spellings of Kurdaitcha are Cadiche and Kadaitcha.

Background

Among traditional Indigenous Australians there is no such thing as a belief in natural death. All deaths are considered to be the result of evil spirits or spells, usually influenced by an enemy. Often, a dying person will whisper the name of the person they think caused their death. If the identity of the guilty person is not known, a "magic man" will watch for a sign, such as an animal burrow leading from the grave showing the direction of the home of the guilty party. This may take years but the identity is always eventually discovered. The elders of the mob that the deceased belonged to then hold a meeting to decide a suitable punishment. A Kurdaitcha may or may not be arranged to avenge them. The practice of Kurdaitcha had died out completely in Southern Australia by the 20th century although it was still carried out infrequently in the North.^[1] The practice, in regard to bone pointing by itself, does continue into modern times albeit very rarely.

Illapurinja

An Illapurinja, literally "the changed one", is a female Kurdaitcha who is secretly sent by her husband to avenge some wrong, most often the failure of a woman to cut herself as a mark of sorrow on the death of a family member. Believed to be entirely mythical, the fear of the Illapurinja would be enough to induce the following of the custom.^[2]

Kurdaitcha shoes

The name Kurdaitcha is also used by Europeans to refer to the oval shoes worn by the Kurdaitcha. The Indigenous name for the shoes are interlinia in Northern Australia and intathurta in the South. The shoe is basically a mat of feathers mixed with human blood in such a way that the blood can not be detected and even a close examination does not reveal how the feathers remain stuck together. The upper surface is covered with a net woven from human hair. An opening in the centre allows the foot to be inserted. It is taboo for any woman or child to see them and when not in use are kept wrapped in kangaroo skin or hidden in a sacred place. Although they may be used more than once they usually don't last more than one journey.^[3] When in use, they are decorated with lines of white and pink down and are said to leave no tracks.^[4]

Before the shoes can be worn a secret ritual must be performed. A stone is heated red-hot and then placed against the ball of the small toe. Once the joint has softened the toe is jerked outwards, dislocating the joint. Although the ritual has never been observed, examinations of the feet of men who claim to be Kurdaitcha have all shown the same peculiar dislocation. Additionally, the genuine Kurdaitcha shoe has a small opening on one side where a dislocated little toe can be inserted.^[5]

Bone pointing

The expectation that death would result from having a bone pointed at a victim is not without foundation. Other similar rituals that cause death have been recorded around the world.^[6] Victims become listless and apathetic, usually refusing food or water with death often occurring within days of being "cursed". When victims survive, it is assumed that the ritual was not done faultlessly. The phenomenon is recognized as psychosomatic in that death is caused by an emotional response—often fear—to some suggested outside force and is known as "voodoo death." As this term refers to a specific religion, the medical establishment has suggested that "self-willed death," or "bone-pointing syndrome" is more appropriate.^[7][8] In Australia, the practice is still common enough that hospitals and nursing staff are trained to manage illness caused by "bad spirits" and bone pointing.^[9]

Example

The following story is related about the role of kurdaitcha by John Godwin and Ronald Rose:^[10][11]

In 1953, a dying Aborigine named Kinjika was flown from Arnhem Land in Australia's Northern Territory to a hospital in Darwin. Tests revealed he had not been poisoned, injured, nor was he suffering from any sort of injury. Yet, the man was most definitely dying. After four days of agony spent in the hospital, Kinjika died on the fifth. It was said he died of bone pointing.

"Bone pointing" is a method of execution used by the Aborigines. It is said to leave no trace, and never fails to kill its victim. The bone used in this curse either made of either human, kangaroo, emu or even wood. The shape of the killing-bone, or kundela, varies from tribe to tribe. The lengths can be from six to nine inches. They look like a long needle. At the rounded end, a piece of hair is attached through the hole, and glued into place with a gummy resin from the spinifex bush. Before it can be used, the kundela is charged with a powerful psychic energy in a ritual that is kept secret from women and those who are not tribe members. To be effective, the ritual must be performed faultlessly. The bone is then given to the kurdaitcha, who are the tribe's ritual killers.
These killers then go and hunt (if the person has fled) the condemned. The name, kurdaitcha comes from the slippers they wear while on the hunt. The slippers are made of cockatoo (or emu) feathers and human hair—they virtually leave no footprints. Also, they wear kangaroo hair, which is stuck to their bodies after they coat themselves in human blood and they also don masks of emu feathers. They hunt in pairs or threes and will pursue their quarry for years if necessary, never giving up until the person has been cursed.

Once the man is caught, one of the kurdaitcha goes down onto one knee and points the kundela. The victim is said to be frozen with fear and stays to hear the curse, a brief piercing chant, that the kurdaitcha chants. Then, he and his fellow hunters return to the village and the kundela is ritually burned.

The condemned man may live for several days or even weeks. But, he believes so strongly in the curse that has been uttered, that he will surely die. It is said that the ritual loading of the kundela creates a "spear of thought" which pierces the victim when the bone is pointed at him. It is as if an actual spear has been thrust at him and his death is certain.

Kinjika had been accused of an incestuous relationship (their mothers were the daughters of the same woman by different fathers). Instead of going to his trial, he fled the village. The hunters found him and cursed him. It is said that is why he died.

Related rituals

Ngadhundi Is a ritual from the lower River Murray. A discarded bone from food eaten by the intended victim is collected and shaped into a thin skewer. The eye of a Murray cod and flesh from a fresh corpse is coated in a paste made from fish oil and red ochre and attached to the end of the bone. The bone is then soaked in liquid from a decomposing corpse. When completed, the bone is placed near a fire until the paste melts and the lump drops off. The victim usually dies which could be from being secretly scratched with the point causing them to die from infection.

Bulk: In Victoria, a stone was sometimes used instead of a bone. A bulk is a round or egg-shaped smooth stone used by claimed sorcerers. Usually black or dark blue, the stone was thought to be capable of independent motion and was considered dangerous for anyone apart from the owner to touch or even see. To kill, the bulk was placed in the fresh faeces of the intended victim.

Neiljeri: A sharpened bone, usually human, is cut to a length of up to 15 centimetres (5.9 in). It is then inserted into the flesh of a decomposing corpse and left for several weeks, after which it is wrapped in hair or feathers and soaked in liquid from the corpse. The victim is then scratched while asleep. If a quicker death was required, the bone would be inserted in the anus or mouth of the sleeping victim. This method of murder however would be through causing massive infection, as aborigines had limited medicines and no antibiotics.

Stealthy murder: A more direct method of killing that requires two people. A thin kangaroo or emu bone up to 37 centimetres (15 in) in length is split in half lengthwise, then one half is sharpened to an extremely fine point. The shape of the bone forms a semicircular point similar to the nib of a pen. One person holds the victim (usually while he sleeps) while a second inserts the bone in the hollow of the neck behind the collarbone and pushes it down until it pierces the heart. When the bone is withdrawn, it leaves a very small semi circular flap of flesh which is then pressed down to seal the wound. The wound does not bleed and is almost invisible. In 1884, two such murders were recorded near Adelaide and in the early 1970s a 6,000-year-old skeleton was unearthed at Roonka, a site 5 km (3.1 mi) south of Blanchetown, South Australia, that had a similar bone still in position within the ribcage. The burial was of a young person of high status but it is unclear if the bone was the cause of death or if it had been used in a ritual post mortem.

John Howard

In 2004, Indigenous Australians who disagreed with his policies ritually cursed the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard by pointing a bone at him. He is still alive as of 2014.^[12]

See also

• Nocebo

References

1. Jump up ^ Baldwin Spencer & F.J. Gillen Native Tribes of Central Australia Cambridge University Press, (1899) 2010 Pg.476 - 477 ISBN 978-1-108-02044-2
2. Jump up ^ Spencer & Gillen Pg.489
3. Jump up ^ Spencer & Gillen 2010 Pg.477 - 478
4. Jump up ^ Spencer & Gillen 2010 Pg.480
5. Jump up ^ Spencer & Gillen 2010 Pg.478
   A large number of Kurdaitcha shoes are in collections, however, most are too small for feet or do not have the small hole in the side. It is speculated that, due to the difficulty of their construction, many shoes are made as practice rather than to be worn.
6. Jump up ^ Roonka. Compiled by Dr Keryn Walshe for the South Australian Museum. Hyde Park Press 2009 ISBN 978-0-646-50388-2
7. Jump up ^ Scared to Death: Self-Willed Death, or the Bone-Pointing Syndrome Biology Online 4 September 2007
8. Jump up ^ Cannon, Walter. "Voodoo Death." pp. 169–181.
9. Jump up ^ Curtis, Ramsden, FriendshipEmergency and Trauma Nursing Elsevier Australia, 2007 ISBN 0-7295-3769-2 Pg 34
10. Jump up ^ John Godwin, Unsolved: The World of the Unknown, pp. 163–76
11. Jump up ^ Ronald Rose, Living Magic, pp. 30–36
12. Jump up ^ "Aborigines put curse on Australian PM etc". European Network for Indigenous Australian Rights: news (Sydney: einar.org). 20 April 2004. Retrieved 8 February 2011.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurdaitcha

A HISTORY OF ABORIGINAL VOTING RIGHTS – RACIST STATE GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA

Aboriginal people have fought and continue to fight hard for rights. The statement starts with a patronising, racist statement that doesn't identify that problems for the tribal people are primarily created by violent terrorist groups such as the V.E.C.

At different times in Australian history these rights were withheld from Aboriginal people by Federal, State and local government authorities.

Bullshit. The truth is that your rights are not derived from these so-called authorities. 

Neither are the are the members of the tribes. 

Aboriginal organisations and individuals carried on the struggle for rights over many decades.

According to the racist V.E.C.. 'the struggle' ended at some time in the past.

Maybe they should ask Gunnai elder Robbie Thorpe if this is actually the case? 

The V.E.C. used this technique to give a false impression that;
                           a) That everything is fair,

                           b) The tribes are not trying to get their land back, and

                           c) That the tribes agree that they are subordinate to this terrorist Victorian cistern. 

Using a range of strategies, they drew public attention to their grievances and often gained access to politicians at the highest level.

Aboriginal leaders wrote letters to members of parliament, they sent petitions, they held demonstrations and formed political organisations to agitate for reform.

Pre 1900

Between 1856 and 1900 all Australian colonies had given –as if it was theirs to give– Aboriginal men the right to vote. 

 

However, in Western Australia and Queensland being a property owner was a pre-condition of being able to vote. 

 

This is how their racist crime syndicate works. 

 

It offers you something that you 'conditional access' to the resources that they stole off you, in exchange for tacit acceptance of their theft & control of you, your land & your land's resources.

 

Pretty fair deal, yes?  

 

At the time, this would have applied to few, if any, Aboriginal men. 

 In 1894, South Australia was the only colony to give the vote to women, including Aboriginal women. 

Despite this, the right to vote was often very difficult to exercise due to restrictive conditions on voter registration.

1902 - The Commonwealth Electoral Act

In 1902 the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1902 was passed. The Act outlined who could vote in Federal elections and Section 4 of the Act stated:

  

No Aboriginal native of Australia, Africa or the Islands of the Pacific except New Zealand shall be entitled to have his name placed on an Electoral Roll unless so entitled under section 41 of the Constitution.

 

Notice that the racist term Aboriginal is being applied to black people from a variety of countries. 

 

This is because there is no race of people called 'Aboriginal'. 

 

It is a racist word employed by privileged whites to simplify & reduce the identity of black men & women. 

 

These terrorists then infect you & them with the same racist spell.  

  The Act was interpreted very narrowly with reference to Aboriginal people, so that only those Aboriginal people whose names were already on the electoral roll for their State elections would be able to vote in the Commonwealth elections. This right would die with them, because their children's names could not be added to the roll. In addition to this, if an Aboriginal person's name was removed from the State electoral roll (if they were serving a prison term or were dependent on welfare, for example), then they would also be struck from the Commonwealth electoral roll with no further opportunity to enrol.

As per usual, this racist article refuses to address the issue of choice. As in the choice of people to under under their own lore, or, the invaders law. 

According to these violent terrorists; FREEDOM DOES NOT EXTEND TO CHOOSING WHAT LORE/LAW YOU LIVE BY.

1949: Voting rights granted to Aboriginal servicemen

The Australian Aborigines League (AAL), formed in 1932 by William Cooper, fought to end all discriminatory practices against Aboriginal people in "civic, political and economic" spheres and demanded full citizens "rights". 

 

The violent, racist tactics of the Anglo terrorists show fruit when they have managed to convince tribal people to appeal for 'more rights' in the terrorist Anglo cistern.

This is no different to the battered-wife syndrome where if you consistently beat somebody down with violence and abuse, some will ask & beg for 'more rights' as opposed to an equal, fair and reasonable standard of behaviour.

 

The point of this is that it legitimises the violence and crime, although even worse, it includes you as a participant, and, traps you into the benefit/liability logic where the government expects you to pay $1000 because you accepted a gift of being able to vote for which psychopath wil rape you for the next 4 years. 

 

The Australian Government agreed and in 1949 the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 was amended to give the Federal vote to Aboriginal people who were serving, or who had served, in the defence forces.

1962: Voting rights for all Aboriginal people

In 1962 the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 was again amended to give all Aboriginal people the right to vote in Commonwealth elections, although voting was not compulsory.

1983: Voting becomes compulsory

A further amendment to the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 was passed in 1983 which made voting compulsory for all enrolled Aboriginal people. 

 Today Aboriginal people have the same citizenship rights as other Australians. 

SEE HOW RACISM WORKS?

The tribes own the land and have their own superior lore, but, in 2014, we still have racist white criminals trying to tell black people what their rules are for living.
 
However, they are typically underrepresented/uninterested? when elections arise. 

Fewer Aboriginal people cast their vote on election day than are eligible –as opposed to white people? More racism designed to train and program you and your opinion– and there is currently only one Aboriginal in the Australian Parliament.

In contrast, a number of Aboriginal people do currently represent electorates at State and Territorial level, and South Australia has had an Aboriginal Governor, Sir Douglas Nicholls (external link).

The future

It is compulsory for Australian citizens who are 18 years of age or older to be enrolled and vote. More importantly, no political process can be truly democratic without the direct input of all people.

 

The VEC wants to empower all voters to cast their vote on election day. 

 

The VEC encourages Aboriginal Victorians to: Yarn up, be strong and vote.
https://www.vec.vic.gov.au/Education/education-programs-aboriginal-history.html 

VICTORIA POLICE REVENUE RAISING PROPAGANDA NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC – ROAD SAFETY CAMERAS IN BUSY MELBOURNE LOCATIONS TO BE SWITCHED ON

Friday, 21 February 2014  

Fixed road safety –as opposed to speed cameras, which is a dishonest, Orwellian way to communicate propaganda to the public that Victoria Police is actively stealing from on behalf of the registered business called 'THE STATE OF VICTORIA – DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE' cameras designed to reduce road trauma –More police lies & propaganda. Notice that the police article starts off with propaganda & outright lies– at some of Melbourne’s busiest locations –best opportunities to steal/raise revenue– will be soon switched on.

The cameras, aimed at encouraging motorists to slow down to reduce the number of collisions and injuries, –notice the lack of proof with the police claim/lie? Governments lower 'speed limits' purely to raise more money for their own registered business– are located in 40km/h speed zones at the intersections of Flinders and Williams streets and Exhibition and Victoria streets in the CBD, and Fitzroy Street and Lakeside Drive –i happen to know this intersection, and the cameras used to go off randomly, ALL THE TIME. Also worth noting that this intersection has a speed & red camera which doubles the revenue that the government can steal from the public– in St Kilda.

The cameras were deactivated in 2012 when the reduced speed limits were introduced to give motorists time to adjust to the changes.

Variable message signs will be placed at each location today warning drivers that the cameras will be enforcing soon.

The cameras will be activated sometime –if it was about safety they would say precisely when these cameras are being switched on. This is typical government lies trying to trick people into breaking their arbitrary rules so the government can capitalise on them– in the next fortnight and the messaging will change to “cameras now enforcing.”

The variable messaging signs will stay in place for a fortnight after the activation of the cameras.

 

Road Policing Superintendent –Trying to use the 'authority' instrument to gain your belief & convince you that this is something other than organised theft and a tax on your movement, as opposed to illustrating independent proof– Kevin Sheridan said this was a reminder to all motorists about the increased risks of speeding in areas where there are large numbers of pedestrians and cyclists. –Notice the lack of quotes when sharing Kev's so-called wisdom. Notice the attempt to try to link safety with revenue raising as if it has a relationship. Notice that their bullshit logic of the dangers "of speeding in areas where there are large numbers of pedestrians and cyclists" hasn't prevented the government from protecting people or enforcing "safety speeds" @ the Grand Prix. If Kev was telling the truth, we would not be safe watching any type of motorbike, car, truck race at the track. How could we when the speeds are significantly faster than 40 kmph.

“We encourage everyone to be responsible on the roads and to drive within the required speed limits. Now they are quoting Kevvie boy who is trying to paint a connection between responsibility & doing what you are told to do by so-called authority. 

THAT IS HOW DEVIOUS & VIOLENT YOUR GOVERNMENT AND ITS AGENTS ARE.

“The 40km/h speed signs are not advisory - they are the law and if you speed, you will get caught.

"But more importantly, we hope they act as a deterrent so that police and the community see a reduction in collisions and injuries involving our most vulnerable road users."
Finally, we get some more lies & marketing to finish. This press release starts with propaganda, ends with propaganda, with the middle being the same. This press release hasn't been prepared to share truth, but, to illustrate authority, and the appearance of fairness. The liars in the corporate media will basically copy/paste this and try to keep you ignorant, poor and under the authority of these public servants. This underpins the importance of independent media outlets such as this one. To that end, thank you for supporting today, we can't look to these criminals for answers, we need to supply them for ourselves.


Belle Nolan
Media Officer
VP22611/2012

http://www.vicpolicenews.com.au/news/2811-road-safety-cameras-in-busy-melbourne-locations-to-be-switched-on.html 

JUDICIARY AMENDMENT ACT 1984

Judiciary Amendment Act 1984 No. 7 of 1984 - SECT 1

Short title.

An Act to amend the Judiciary Act 1903

(Assented to 4 April 1984) Short title, &c.

1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Judiciary Amendment Act 1984.

(2) The Judiciary Act 1903*1* is in this Act referred to as the Principal Act.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/jaa1984192/s1.html 

Judiciary Amendment Act 1984 No. 7 of 1984 - SECT 2

Commencement 2. This Act shall come into operation on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent. 

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/jaa1984192/s2.html

Judiciary Amendment Act 1984 No. 7 of 1984 - SECT 3

3. After Part VII of the Principal Act the following Part is inserted: ''PART
VIII-ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN ORDERS CONCERNING COURT
PROCEEDINGS Interpretation

''46. In this Part-

'Australia' includes the external Territories;

'court' means a court of Victoria, and includes a Judge of such a court and
any Magistrate, Justice of the Peace or Coroner of Victoria;

'make', in relation to an order being a direction, includes give;

'order' includes a direction;

'proceedings' means criminal proceedings arising out of, or in any way
relating to, the incident that occurred at the Sheraton Hotel in Melbourne on
the night of 30 November 1983 involving the Australian Secret Intelligence
Service. Application

''47. This Part applies to and in relation to-

   (a)  all natural persons, whether resident in Australia or not and whether
        Australian citizens or not; and

   (b)  all bodies corporate, whether incorporated in Australia or not, and
        extends to acts done or omitted to be done outside Australia. Crown to
        be bound

''48. This Part binds the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, of each of the
States, of the Northern Territory and of Norfolk Island. Contravention of
order to constitute contempt

''49. (1) If a court makes an order to which this sub-section applies in
relation to proceedings before the court on the ground, or on grounds that
include the ground, however the ground is expressed, that the making of the
order is necessary or desirable in the interests of the national or
international security of Australia or in the interests of the physical safety
of the accused, of a witness or of any other person, a person shall not
contravene or fail to comply with the order so far as it is applicable in
relation to the last-mentioned person.

''(2) By force of this sub-section, an order referred to in sub-section (1)
applies, except so far as is inconsistent with the express terms of the order,
in like manner as this Part applies by virtue of section 47.

''(3) Sub-section (1) applies to-

   (a)  an order that the proceedings are, or part of the proceedings is, to
        take place in a closed hearing;

   (b)  an order that a person is, or persons included in a specified class of
        persons are, to be excluded from the whole or part of the proceedings;

   (c)  an order prohibiting or restricting the disclosure of information with
        respect to the whole or part of the proceedings;

   (d)  an order prohibiting or restricting the publication of a report of or
        relating to the whole or part of the proceedings;

   (e)  an order for the purpose of ensuring that no person without the
        approval of the court has access, whether before, during or after the
        hearing of the proceedings, to any indictment, affidavit, exhibit or
        other document used in the proceedings or to the records of the court
        relating to the proceedings; or

   (f)  an order combining any 2 or more of the foregoing orders.

''(4) If a person contravenes or fails to comply with an order referred to in
sub-section (1), the Federal Court of Australia has the same powers to punish
the person for the contravention or failure as if the order had been made by
that Court. Reports

''50. (1) Subject to sub-section (2), the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth
shall, as soon as practicable after each 30 June, lay before each House of the
Parliament a report setting out-

   (a)  the number of proceedings in which, to his knowledge, orders referred
        to in sub-section 49 (1) were made during the year that ended on that
        date; and

   (b)  particulars of those proceedings, including particulars of the
        judgments.

''(2) Sub-section (1) does not require the making of a report in terms that
would be inconsistent with any order referred to in sub-section 49 (1).''.
Application of this Part

''51. This Part does not apply in relation to an order made later than 2 years
after the commencement of the Criminal Proceedings Act 1984 of Victoria.''. 

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/jaa1984192/s3.html 

MALFEASANCE BY THE JUDICIARY AND OTHER AGENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT

Facebook post as posted by 'sir sovereign mika'

"When is the court or police acting malfeasant? 

If a cop or judge do not follow their procedure to the letter and you can cite the provision showing them to be malfeasant they can be charged for it civilly, removed from office, or even charged criminally . 

This is why learning their procedure is so important. 

Don't learn all the acts and statutes that they are bound by since you are not an actor.

Consider yourself the director of the play as a sovereign and they all have to follow strict rules of performance .

"Malfeasance has been defined by appellate courts in other jurisdictions as a wrongful act which the actor has no legal right to do; as any wrongful conduct which affects, interrupts or interferes with the performance of official duty; as an act for which there is no authority or warrant of law; as an act which a person ought not to do; as an act which is wholly wrongful and unlawful; as that which an officer has no authority to do and is positively wrong or unlawful; and as the unjust performance of some act which the party performing it has no right, or has contracted not, to do. ”

—Daugherty v. Ellis, 142 W. Va. 340, 357-8, 97 S.E.2d 33, 42-3 (W. Va. 1956) (internal citations)"