Apply these methods to either U.S., Canadian, Australian, English, New Zealand etc court systems or anywhere else the Romans may have roamed.
When confronted by police in any situation and they ask question respond to police, “I do not understand the nature and cause of your inquiry.” Keep repeating this to all their statements or questions.
If they threaten arrest state, “I do not understand the nature and cause of the charges; I object you lack jurisdiction.”
If in police station or car do not answer questions. Say, “I wish to speak to my counsel.” Do not delay in saying this. Do not say anything no matter how much they threaten or speak to you.
Never sign anything. You do not have to give them fingerprints or anything else. Never give name.
You are not the name on document. The document is commercial paper. They will try anything to get you into contract.
"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the man who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in the flesh.”
“The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus.”
– United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 540 (District Court, M.D. PA. 1947)
Once one hires an Attornor, and tell (testifies to) the Attornor (the enemy’s spy and Officer of the Court) what has happened, the Attornor is required by law to share (Discovery) ALL evidence, which he obtains from his Client, with the Prosecutor. “You have the right to remain silent, everything that you say (to any of these devils), CAN and WILL be used against YOU.” Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436(1966). You would be wise to remain silent! “Open mouth, insert foot!” It is all a game, you are a pawn; and you have been prearranged to be the loser. Here is another good one, learn to answer a question with question. The master asks the question and the slave or servant answers.
Start of proceeding in court, after they call the name of defendant.
You say:
"My presence is special in regards to that matter.
"I am not the defendant, I am the Claimant.
"I do not understand the Nature and Cause of the Charges.
"I take exception, you lack jurisdiction."
The following is for after above statement in court to be used throughout rest of proceeding. This takes a little practice to remember without it written, which should be your goal. More than likely you won't have this written down on you.
I am not the defendant, I am the Claimant. (Whenever anyone calls defendant name or calls you defendant)
I do not understand the Nature and Cause of the Charges. (Remember to say this of all things. Never come into understanding with them unless using acceptance method, which this is not)
I do not wish counsel at this time. (Everytime judge asks if you want lawyer or attempt to assign one, then state #6 also)
My Mother calls me Son/Daughter. (If they ask your name, optional)
I make objection, you lack jurisdiction. (when DA makes motion or request against you)
I take exception, you lack jurisdiction. (when judge accepts motion or makes order against you)
Yes sir, you sure can hold me in contempt, asked and answered, no issue, Demand to move on. (If they threaten to hold you in contempt say this)
If they repeat any question, such as, "what is your name", state "Asked and answered, Demand to move on."
There are additional statements that can be made, but one must learn them. This here are the basics of standing your Square.
https://www.facebook.com/dean.kory/posts/10203918103770429:0
No comments:
Post a Comment