Tuesday, September 29, 2015



Hopefully you all know that with the establishment of www.mikipedia.com.au to house all of my various mikiverse pages, this page ceased to be a working function approximately 15 months ago.

The aim was to redress the inability of people to grab particular pieces of info and posts quickly, as well as to have my own site for the work that i have devoted the past six or seven years to on top of the research that i have been doing for years before that. 

i also felt that the nature of my work is such,  that coupled with the 'global darkening' that is taking place, pressure may be placed on blogger/blogspot to remove my posts in their entirety.

Best of all, i was able to post pdf's of the thousands of law books that in the past, i had to go to great lengths just to share a portion thereof.

As i learn and develop my coding skills, i am building my mikipedia site to better reflect my vision and shall, forthwith, be renaming Mikiverse Law, Mikipedia Law Blog, and (as you probably imagine) shall be using this space as a blog that will feature on the new site that i am building. 

This should, give a good balance between info on particular topics of relevance, as well as coverage and analysis of the day to happenings in our world.

For those of you that don't know, i left the cistern in 2009 and have lived 'on the streets' ever since, originally in a 1992 Mazda 121 'bubble car', followed by a 1983 Holden Commodore Station Wagon, and presently, a 1992 Mitsubishi Starwagon that i lovingly dub my vansion. 

i have never received payment for my work as i see it as the duty of those that know something valuable to assist those that know less, or are still sleeping in their pods.

That said, one day, i would like to leave these streets and be able to buy a farm in order to provide for myself and the family that i still dream of one day being a part of. It may never come to be, so in that instance, i simply trust that i can make a small contribution to helping us to understand the problem and implementing a cure whilst respecting free will. To that end, i am building a school that will in the future serve this purpose alongside the new website.

Humbly, and sincerely i thank all of you for your support, especially if you were able to gain a nugget that has helped you on your journey.

With the greatest honour, respect and love


PS. Facebook has recently censored and closed my mikipedia (formerly mikiverse) page down until i submit ID which i don't possess. This happened once before, last november, and upon sending a meme in lieu of ID, it was restored, and they approved the change to mikipedia.
This is the meme that i sent farcical book in lieu of ID last November
If you were connected with me and haven't reconnected yet, you can connect with me @




Steven Spiers is presently being held as a political prisoner @ the Cessnock Correctional Centre in country New South Wales.

He is there because his principles and political beliefs clash with the political cistern that advertises itself as being fair, reasonable & just.

Steven is in jail despite the fact that the so-called independent arbitrator annulled the charges.

You may be asking yourself how this can be, and it is because Steven refused to identify with the name Steven Spiers.

So, a man is in jail, because a criminal named David Helpman deemed it to be so.

Steven has requested that everyone send him a post card to;
Steven of the house of Spiers,
555364 Cessnock Correctional centre,
Po box 32 Cessnock NSW 2325

Please be aware that even if you send one, it may be censored or thrown in the bin so if you do send one then please note it in the comments section below so when he is released, Steven will have a chance to compare notes so to speak upon release.

i hope & pray that Steven has a safe three months and is released unharmed. 

i have tremendous respect for a man that stands on his principles.

Steven's own thoughts are articulated below. i do not know who transcribed, but i thank them for doing so.


"I am Steven Spiers I've been sentenced to 3 months gaol. I'm incarcerated at Cesnock correctional centre under mental health segregation for being under hunger striking. I was sentenced 3 months by David Helpman in a local court without having a hearing; I was sentenced without having entered a plea. 

David Helpman had me arrested upon entering court so legal aid could enter a plea on my behalf by applying for an appeal. 

I've then entered the district court before judge Murphly Wells to appeal sentencing albeit never having a hearing. 

I had to withdraw the appeal in the district court to reenter the local court before David Helpman for an annulment process. 

David Helpman stated that he had overstepped his authority having heard the hearing ex parte in my absence. 

David Helpman then stated I was free to return home as long as i agreed that i was the person.

I asked for David Helpmans oath and bond under penalty of perjury, was denied and was subsequently removed from the court and put into custody.

I am currently serving sentence created in my absence that was annulled only on condition of forced agreeance that I am the person. I quoted James 2:9 KJV "But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors." and was taken into custody.

If I had agreed to being Steven SPIERS the person I would be at home right now, but because I chose to stand with God (the Truth) I am in gaol. Now consider if I am not the person Steven SPIERS being free to go home having successfully annulled the matters whom have they incarcerated? A nameless man being now forced the person inside gaol. I've been given a prison number 555364 under SPIERS, STEVEN the person a direct contradiction to the decisions of David Helpman.

Grafton Correctional Centre have refused to process my bail applications, denied legal aid, failed to post for me and an 14th and 19th of August refused to put my bail applications in. The ombudsman refuses to take a complaint from me. I am left in no mans land leaving me no choice but to go on hunger strike. I am asking the Attorney's General of NSW and the Commonwealth to treat this matter as a serious misjustice; and ask the Governor of NSW why am i being left in no man's land.

I am being held under conditions that would be considered a deprivation of liberty and torture while under conditions of false imprisonment. I am in a cell locked in 21 hours of the day with an hour and a half release to a small yard with other prisoners. I am in an enclosed cell with no air flow, in a cell that goes hot and cold with doctored heating. I am currently in a mental health unit with no staff, being told only a controlled room is watching. I have been left in a fully lit cell all night. This to me is considered torture.

I am currently falsely imprisoned and on hunger strike suffering torture and deprivation of liberty. I should be free right now. If I am not the person free whom is actually incarcerated. I appeal to the Governor General's both State and Commonwealth to address this matter immediately and thoroughly as indemnity for these actions will be forthcoming.

Please publish share and send to the AG GG Governor and whoever else is nexurious discussion."

You can connect with Steven on Facebook @
or be a part of a community that wants to assist those that go to court by going to
or me @ 
mikipedia (prev mikiverse) is presently off line due to farcical book censorship. 

Thursday, July 17, 2014


Robert Menard

Do not let those who are not members of the government make claims which disempower you, and somehow magically empower the government. It is ignorant fear mongering, and is simply false information being spread.

It began with your parents giving you YOUR name. Before it ever existed on any piece of paper, it was given to you. It existed then, and you were the first owner, holder, and user.

The act of registration does not ''give it' (hand over) to the Crown. It is true the act of registration establishes an association, which the identifier points to. It is used as an identifier and establishes that there exists a person with certain rights and duties. This does not mean that its use will always identify that same person. An ‘arrow sign’ does not create a destination. It can point to it, if it already exists, but it does not create one if it doesn’t. A sign saying ‘Carson City 20 Miles’ planted in the middle of nowhere will not cause a city to magically pop up 20 miles distant. The city must exist first, then you can point to it.

The government has never claimed they own our names, and when asked will deny it. Why disempower yourself by claiming that what is clearly YOURS, belongs to someone else, when they have never made that claim? Nanny CAN’T FLY, and your name is not somehow their magical property.

Both the name and the human named, pre-existed the person created by registration.

When you were a child your name was one thing. Your parents used it, your schools and friends used it. The government used it. Now that you are an adult, those people who once had authority over you, can still use your name, but they can’t claim that because you are using the same name, they have the same level of authority over you. It is ludicrous to claim otherwise. Of course, if you went back to school as a student, AND MAINTAINED YOUR ASSOCIATIONS, they would have that same level of authority. The name itself does not create the association.

Saying “I am not that name!” to avoid duties and responsibilities when there is still an association, is very childish. One can keep their name, and change their associations, thus their duties and obligations.

My name is Robert Arthur Menard. That is what my name was when I was a child of the Province. It is what my name is now that I am a Freeman-on-the-Land. Using my name does not automatically make me one or the other. Although others have the same name as I do, I own mine, and no government agent or operator has ever tried to claim any ownership over it. I have heard others who claim the government owns our names, if they were used for registration, but they have never brought any proof. People in the government have clearly rejected the concept that they own everyone’s names, and do not act as owners of them. But still people ignorantly spread this concept.

The confusion arises because of a basic logical fallacy. The name is used to identify someone, and is one thing, and is used to point to their status or associations. Their person. Which is another thing. Which in most cases identifies a child of the Province. A ward. Use of the name does not establish the association, nor does denying the name break it if it already exists. Denying the name when there is still an association is very childish. It is akin to closing one’s eyes and saying “You can’t see me.”. The goal is to change our associations so that the name (the exact same name) no longer points to a bonded child of the Province, but to a Freeman. You do not accomplish that by abandoning the very thing you were given as an infant by your parents to facilitate that. Just because a name is needed to establish an association, does not mean use of that name establishes one.

If I wanted to disempower the people of the Freedom movement, I would share ideas that are untrue but are seemingly justified on the surface, and cause them to abandon those things which could actually empower them. I would try to get them to abandon their names and persons, as they would then be abandoning their wealth others are holding in trust. I would get them to believe the name itself creates the person and evidences an association, instead of just being an identifier thereof. I would present to them a wholly useless tactic, like denying being ‘the name’, which does not change their status as a child or ward, merely identifies them as a petulant, ignorant and belligerent one. I would not get them looking at the associations created, and how to change those, while keeping their name. No I would ask they abandon that first. Many would fail to distinguish between the person (the rights and duties created by association) and the name (the identifier of the person created with the association) and will try unsuccessfully to avoid the latter by abandoning the former. They will be like travellers on a road, who think they can avoid a distant city by simply taking down the sign which points to it.

If you believe that the government owns your name, and you have NO PROOF that the government has ever made that claim; if you believe you can avoid duties and obligations established by associations merely by abandoning the name but not changing your associations and status as a child of the province; if you do not distinguish between a person and its name, or a thing and its name; then you are not a force of empowerment for the people. The ideas you share are harmful, false and wrong.

When you were registered as an infant the government put you in diapers. Good thing for an infant, but not needed as an adult. You can remove them, but you need to learn to use the toilet and wipe your arse. You need to be able to prove you can do that, and Magical Nanny will stop trying to nanny you. However removing your diaper all by yourself, (abandoning your name and rejecting the person) without learning to use the toilet and wipe your arse, (establish a new person with greater rights and duties as a Free adult) means you will still be seen as a child, and Nanny can and will put you back in a diaper, lest you start smearing your faeces all over the common walls.

There are some absolutely ludicrous arguments floating around, the idea of government owning our names being near the top of the list. It would be so easy to prove. Simply make a public claim that you own your name, and see if ANYONE disputes it, and if they don’t, establish sole ownership as a function of law. You will find no one in the government will dispute that claim. They will not seek to claim ownership, for the simple reason that they do not own it, and they do not need to own it, nor have you accept it, in order to hold you accountable to the person identified by it.

Deny the name all you want. The association which identifies you as a child of the province will still be in existence, and your tactic identifies you as someone worthy of being treated as a child. You will be shooting yourself in your own foot.

Stop making claims that disempower yourself. If the people in the government want to claim they own your name, LET THEM DO IT! Do not do it for them like it is a fait accompli.