NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT AND CLAIM OF RIGHT

by andrew on Thursday, July 29th, 2010 | No Comments

This notice was notarized and served by registered post on 2010 July 29:

Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right

Whereas it is my understanding Australia/Australian Continent/Any Variations Thereof is a common law jurisdiction, and,

Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,

Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which

has been given the force of law, and,

Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,

Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Australia is a representative one, and,

Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,

Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and,

Whereas it is my understanding Section 32 of the Constitution Act limits it to members and employees of government, and,

Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SIN (Social Insurance Number) are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s SIN, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that a claim of right establishes a lawful excuse and, that this factual truth is expressed in Section 39 of the Criminal Code of Canada, and,

Whereas it is my understanding people in Canada have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,

Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,

Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,

Whereas I, Andrew Neil of the Paterson Family/Clan am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,

Whereas, it is my understanding that I have the right to claim up to 160 acres, settle on, and own, existing un-surveyed Crown Land and lawfully claim it as mine, without limitation, and grant myself full Allodial Title to it, and,

Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and,

Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,

Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,

Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that any TOLL road is in fact and actuality, public property to which I have the right of use and access free of charge and,

Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my Social Insurance Number, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued by the British Columbia Securities Commission create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,

Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,

Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,

Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence thereby, and henceforth, prohibiting any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time,

Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, Andrew Neil of the Paterson Family/Clan, a Freeman-on the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .

Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my community’s standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.

Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right as mentioned in the Criminal Code of Canada.

Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and, who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.

Furthermore, I claim full custody of my child, xxxxx xxxx of the Paterson Family/Clan as her lawful father, being flesh and blood of my flesh and blood and that my child is not a ward of the state but is in my joint care with my lawful wife Helena Eva of the Poll Family/Clan to protect, provide and nurture in all the things required for a safe and happy upbringing until my child reaches the age of majority of eighteen years, whereas and when she can make her own claim of right.

Furthermore, I claim the right to properly educate my child, xxxxx xxxx of the Paterson Family/Clan and shall make all the choices thereof within and without the states interference until she reaches the age of majority of eighteen years, whereas and when she may claim the right to decide for herself.

Furthermore, I claim the bonds and/or securities that were created at birth for my child under the de facto Corporate/Corporation name of XXXXX XXXX XXXXX and all profits and/or dividends they have produced or will produce retroactive to her birth certificate creation date until she reaches the age of majority of eighteen years whereas and whereupon she may claim the right to have the aforesaid profits and/or quarterly dividends directed to herself upon her own claim of right.

Furthermore, I claim the right to possess, cultivate or use medicinally any plant of the genus Cannabis or any other naturally occurring substance to my healthful benefit and also, I claim the right to the maximum state of health that I can achieve and maintain and the right to cultivate, process, store, use or consume any naturally occurring substance or derivations thereof to that purpose, including, but not exclusively limited to, vitamins, minerals, enzymes, pro-biotics, phyto-nutrients, herbs and homeopathic remedies, the right to uncontaminated air, uncontaminated water, uncontaminated nutrition, and the right to use the resources of any form of healer or therapist for the purpose of achieving and maintaining my health and in doing so, indemnify them of any form of statutory limitation.

Furthermore, I claim to exercise my right to possess unregistered, unlicensed firearms and ammunition and to use the same for target practice at a range or hunting for food or for protection of my flesh and blood body and all those under my immediate care and further swear, under oath never to open fire on another human unless as a last resort to protect human life and property.

Furthermore, I claim that the courts in Canada and British Columbia are de-facto and bound by the Law and Equity Act and are, in fact, in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.

Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land, I am not subject to any Act.

Furthermore, I claim the right to use my ALL CAPS fictitious corporate name ANDREW NEIL PATERSON under the Rule of Necessity when and where I, Andrew Neil of the Paterson Family/Clan, deem it necessary to conduct any and all commerce to provide the basic requirements of life for my flesh and blood body and those in my care. I reserve the right to be the sole Sovereign being of making that decision, when and where I deem it necessary; I place permanent and irrevocable estoppel on any joinder with ANDREW NEIL PATERSON and Andrew Neil of the Paterson Family/Clan under the Rule of Necessity and my use thereof to my betterment and existence.

Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent. Orders of any kind, from any agent representing any and all corporations shall be Billed on a “per order” basis at the starting rate of TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS per order and shall increase at a rate of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS per subsequent order; i.e First order shall be billed at TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS, second order shall be billed at THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS etc. and so forth and shall be directed to the liable Agent making any and all such orders under their Full Commercial Liability.

Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.

Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then, interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.

Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.

Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.

Furthermore, I claim the right to amend this Notice of Intent and Understanding and Claim of Right at any time in the future with Addendums at my own discretion when and where I deem it necessary for the betterment of my existence and those in my immediate care; All Rights Reserved.

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence prohibiting the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land, Andrew Neil of the Paterson Family/Clan.

Place of claim of right: Town of Lake Cowichan, British Columbia, Canada

Dated: ___29th of July, 2010_______________

Claimant: __________________________________

Andrew-Neil: Paterson

Notary Public: __________________________________

Patricia Thomson

Use of a Notary is for attestation and verification purposes only and? does not constitute a change in status or entrance or acceptance of a ?foreign jurisdiction.

OSTF UPDATE 2011

EXAMPLES OF; MY WILL LETTERS

I was given this link by another freedom loving clever cookie and I'm passing it onto you. Interesting stuff that may assist you in your endeavours. It was written by the good people at Save the Bay and this was grabbed from; http://www.savethebay.info/index.php?title=Example_MY_WILL_letters
Introduction

Here are several examples of My Will letters written on a range of subjects associated with Western Port and Port Phillip bays. Use them to formulate your letter.

You will find both the text on this page, and a link to an example MS Word version of a letter to save you the trouble of laying it out.

Things to remember when composing a My Will letter:

• Your My Will letter is first and foremost a petition to Her Majesty the Queen via her lawfully appointed Representatives (the ones you elected).

• You must have your name and address on the letter.

• Sign the letter and include a statement as per sample (I am one of Her Australian Majesty's respectful subjects, God Save the Queen.)

• fax or post it, don’t email the letter, it requires your signature.

• keep the letter simple, succinct and to the point.

• Do not forget to also tell him you want to be kept promptly informed of his actions to your letter.

Not sure who to write to?

This will depend on whether it is a state or federal issue. The following are some suggestions about appropriate people to address the issue:

Federal Issue

House of Representatives

• Your local representative
• The Prime Minister
• The leaders of the opposition parties
• The minister responsible for the area of concern
• Shadow ministers responsible for the area of concern
• Any independents

Senate All of the Senators that represent your State.

State Issue

• Your local representatives
• The Premier
• The leaders of the opposition parties
• The minister responsible for the area of concern
• Shadow ministers responsible for the area of concern
• Any independents

Local Council

The Local Councils don't have any constitutional status, but democratically elected councillors uphold commonwealth law. (Read more here..). Consequently a My Will letter is binding on a local council member, as the Local Government Act 1989 that local councillors swear allegiance to is tied into the Commonwealth Constitution; which, by virtue of Section 5, is binding on all people in Australia- judges, police; all residents.

Issues concerning local councils should be addressed to the State government and any representatives that claims a local government portfolio interest, together with any party leaders.

Ultimately the State Government is responsible for the provision and maintenance of all infrastructure and they have effectively sub-contracted that task to Local Councils. However, how they structure their affairs to deliver services to you is not your issue.

If you don't get a response

If your representatives ignore you, or fails to respond as requested, then you have a number of options:

• send a My Will letter to the Governor or Governor General depending on whether you are dealing with your State or Federal member. In it you ask him to take action by informing the government member who ignored you or failed to respond as requested to abide by his oath of office and duties according to the constitution and as reaffirmed by the High Court.
• If none of these representatives respond according to your Will, then under the Magna Carta you can then partition the Queen with your documents.

Useful Links

The Government have provided very useful websites with all of the contact details of your elected representatives. You will find a set of links on our Contacts page.

Want to know more about My Will letters?

The original book titled "Your Will Be Done" was written by Arthur Chresby.

It is a simple, non technical, beginner's book of the true legal functions of the Queen, Governor General, State Governors, Parliament, Parliamentarians, and the People.

Many people think that they are a voice lost in the wilderness. They see a problem and know many people who see the same problem, however they don't know how to go about taking an effective action and getting a politician to take notice and act.

To quote Arthur Chresby - "It is your legal duty and obligation, and yours alone, to keep your Members and Senators fully informed, at all times, of your 'WILL". That is your true lawful relationship with your Members and your Senators."

You can read the book on line here and/or download a PDF version.

Example Letters
MS Word Example Document
This is an example letter in MS word format. It simply saves you the trouble of laying out and formatting a letter.

When doing a My Will letter its important that you refer to the Your Will Be Done book] as it shows how to address the letter to various levels of parliamentary members. It also explains how to respond if your member tries to fob you off, or ignore you.

Download example MS Word document for complete My Will letter details

Port Phillip Bay Channel Deepening

Mr. Peter Garrett Minister for Environment, Heritage and The Arts Parliament House Suite MG 40 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Fax: (02) 6273 6101 Port Phillip Bay Channel Deepening I know that it is my duty to keep you informed as to MY WILL on any matter that comes before the Parliament or should come before the Parliament. Be informed that it is MY WILL that the Federal Government withhold approval of any channel deepening works in Port Philip Bay Victoria until such time as: the extent of the proposed works is fully and correctly defined, full and complete environmental impact assessments have been undertaken, considered debate has been undertaken on the new extended proposed works, the environmental impact and the ramifications are understood, the proposed container terminal development in Western Port Victoria is assessed, the electors of the local communities are consulted and informed, the will of the people has been determined with respect to the channel deepening works. As I have complied with my obligation to inform you of my will in this matter it is expected that you advise me of your personal action in representing me in accordance with your Oath of Loyalty in accordance with the Australian Constitution. I am one of her Majesty's respectful Subjects, God Save the Queen. Yours faithfully,

Letter on Industrial Development of Port Hastings

Port Hastings Development – Notification of My Will

I know that it is my duty to keep you informed of my will on anything that comes before Parliament, or that should come before Parliament.

Recently I have reviewed the documents made available for public comment by the Port of Hastings Corporation. From chapter 6 Potential Freight Task of these documents it is possible to extract the following figures:

Planned Capacity for 2035

• 2.3 shipping movements per day (page 45)
• 15 shipping berths (page 51)
• 3,700,000 containers per year (page 51 : International + Bass trade)
• 640,000 import/export vehicles per year (page 51)
• 2,500,000 tones of petroleum exports/imports (page 51)
• 1,900,000 tones of dry bulk per year (page 51)
• 3,410 trucks per day (page 52)
• 40 freight trains of 1.2km length per day (page 52)

Planned Capacity for the Long Term

• 6.5 shipping movements per day (page 45)
• 24 ships berths (extrapolated from page 51)
• 8,200,000 containers per annum (page 44 : International + Bass trade)
• 9,630 trucks per day (extrapolated from page 52)
• 113 freight trains of 1.2km length per day (extrapolated from page 52)

Figure 15.6 on page 255 of Section D Recommended Port Land Use and Transport Strategic Study shows a 15 berth dock. A comparison with figure 15.1 shows that this clearly this does not reconcile with the planned longer term capacity and requirement to accommodate an addition 9 berths or 3.15km of dock (refer chapter 6 Potential Freight Task page 44). Rather, this would require doubling the length of dock shown in figure 15.6. It would also appear to require extensive destruction of Western Port and acquisition of considerably more land than declared. (copies of these figures are attached for your reference).

The impact of such development on the region would include:

• The extensive long term of destruction of Western Port bay to:
  • construct 24 shipping berths.
  • handle 6.5 ships per day (they need 0.5km to turn around).
• The noise impact of the train and truck transport.
• The pollution impact of the train and truck transport.
• The impact of the truck transport on Melbourne’s road system (93% of the transport will be to the north and west – chapter 6 Potential Freight Task page 45).
• The impact of the freight traffic volumes on the Peninsula area.
• The visual impact on the landscape.
• The light pollution from the facility at night.
• The impact on residents in the Western Port area.
• The impact on the Bayside area suburbs of the increased traffic volumes.

IT IS MY WILL that you take immediate and ongoing action to ensure that with respect to any aspects associated with the development of Port Hastings that you:

1. engage with the Victorian electorate, and principally the electorates in the vicinity of Port Hastings, to ensure that all citizens are all fully informed of the extent of planned developments and the full extent of the environmental and financial impact on the area;
2. you determine the will of the people with respect to the development of Port Hastings and obtain a clear mandate from the people for this extensive redevelopment;
3. you determine the full extent of the environmental impact of the proposed long term development of Port Hastings and obtain a clear mandate from the people for their acceptance of the environmental impact;
4. you determine a comprehensive and just financial compensation plan for all Victorians impacted by this proposed development should it proceed, including those on the freight corridors;
5. you report all of the Governments findings to the Victorian people via the Parliament to provide a record in Hansard.

As I have complied with my obligation to inform you of my will on this matter it is expected that you advise me of your personal action in representing me in accordance with your Oath of Loyalty in accordance with the Australian Constitution.

I am one of her Majesty's respectful Subjects, God Save the Queen.

Yours faithfully,

WAS THE GREAT FIRE OF LONDON A HUGE SMOKESCREEN?

This was written by my good mate and published on Facebook. I've taken it and re-presented it for your eyes to consume. Enjoy.
by Rob Crombie on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 at 3:04pm

Firstly I'd like to say sorry for the corny title, but I felt it was apt anyway.

I've been studying old legislation for a few years now and it never ceases to amaze me that I still learn something new each time I wander down that avenue. I was taught at school that London suffered from the PLAGUE in 1665 and that the Great Fire of London in 1666 burnt out the rat infestation and thus cured the spread of the desease they carried.

I'm not so sure the accidental fire in Pudding Lane was an accident. This part of London Town was called "CHEAPSIDE". This was a slum area, of no concern to anyone and was without any intrinsic value. It was the mother slum of all slums. An interesting conundrum of chronological dates might show their was a hidden agenda. A Comet made a pass over the Northern Hemisphere in 1664 and most people saw it as a bad omen, the end of the world. Could it be posible that so much negative thought then acted like an antenna and consciousness created the resulting Plague out of negative critical-mass thinking?.... Whatever happened, the Plague spread through England, especially in high density townships and cities like London. What happened next is most remarkable in its timing and we were taught that this Great Fire ended the Plague. It would appear the Plague was nearing the end of its course, and the following events became very CON-venient

Here is my latest finding:-

2ND OCT 1666 ....GREAT FIRE OF LONDON...(started at a bakery in Pudding Lane).

3RD OCT 1666 .....2ND DAY...FIRES STILL BURNING

4TH OCT 1666 ......FIRES FINALLY EXTINGUISHED

5TH OCT 1666.......PARLIAMENT PASSES AN ACT ...CESTUI QUE VIE ACT 1666

CEST.......THIS

TUI...........KILLED

QUE.........THAT

VIE...........LIFE

That's French to English Translation....now look it up in Blacks Law Dictionary and see what it really means in legalese.

"The person whose life measures the duration of a trust, gift, estate or insurance contract".

The fact that this English Law was disguised within a French term might give credence to under-hand agendas being present, but when the translation to English does not match the Legalese translation, it proves beyond any doubt that another agenda was in play, or has since become a very conveneient re-play with new terms being applicable.

This Act is still being used to this day.

We all know Prime Minister Harold Holt went for a swim and never returned. Trouble is, we had to wait 7 years before he was claimed DEAD, and not merely missing in action. WHY?....

Because of the above named act "CESTUI QUE VIE ACT 1666" which can be read here:-

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/aep/1666/caep_16660011_...

This act was so important because it KILLED EVERYONE...and gave them 7 years to claim back their lives. (The inception of the STRAWMAN).. It also robbed them off their properties for the same reason and same claim required.

More important than anything else, it cleared approx one square mile of old buildings, so that new ones could be established. HELLO....CITY OF LONDON.....Yup...out of the ashes of the innocent and decent hard working people came the CITY of SCUMBAGS who control the world today.

Anyone find this too coincidental....then look up on google maps and find Pudding Lane, then look for the Bank of England, (built after The Bank of England Act 1694), do your research on the beginings or creation of the City of London as we know it today was built from the ashes of Cheapside in1666.

Was the Great Fire of London nothing else but a Great Smoke Screen ...(sorry about the pun)

The Golden Square Mile contains among other things, The Bank of England, London Metal Exchange (LME), Fleet Street (News), F.T.S.E. (Stock Exchange), the Royal Mint and the Old Bailey (court)...are you getting the picture yet?

Lets go one step further...The City of London has its own flag, its own constitution & laws, its own defence force, its own police force, in fact its a sovereign nation right inside London itself. As a sovereign nation it is not amenable to any British legislation/rules/laws/flag for they are totally independent. Do the taxes earned from Fleet Street Newsrags, LME, FTSE go towards the British Govt. and the people?.....good question.....and it needs answering...you can take a guess, but that's all it will be. Can someone please research this topic...I have too many other things to do, but I'd love to have something fully sourced. Whilst I have brought this era and matter to your attention I am not stating that these are all facts. The Cestui Qui Vie Act 1666 is fact. The physical City of London created in 1666 is fact, although the City of London Corporation was established much earlier. The buildings I mentioned...I just looked on google maps and if I'm a bit off the mark, so be it, for I do not purport to know London, let alone the City of London....

Oh yeah ....one more things...The council members of the City of London....guess who they are..... again this is a guess-timate by me at the moment, but I have been told these councillors are the front men for the international banking families. This rings a bell in my mind, but pls do not blast me if this is un-proven....I'm looking for people to source this information and bring it to the table so we have nothing but facts in front of us.

This is a skirmish...all those who wish to resource this should start looking to see what you can bring to the table...lets see if lots of eyes can uncover the real facts, its certainly something to do on a rainy weekend, and its fun. There's enough to work on...and enough dots to make a guess at the real picture so please bring something back to the table, and lets get this picture revealed in its full and true colours.....Here's a few videos you might wish to view......enjoy

Feb 1667..... Parliament pass the Rebuilding Act 1667, requiring city approvals for new buildings.

Remember... The City of London Corporation was not created in 1666, it was already well established, but it was never more powerful than it became after the Fire of London 1666, The Bill of Rights 1688, The Bank of England Act 1694 and the Act of Settlement 1700. This was the sole purpose of this thread, to show the Fire of London as a "smokescreen" or False Flag Operation.

THE ENGLISH ACT OF PARLIAMENT THAT ESTABLISHES YOUR STRAWMAN

Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

1666 CHAPTER 11 18_and_19_Cha_2

An Act for Redresse of Inconveniencies by want of Proofe of the Deceases of Persons beyond the Seas or absenting themselves, upon whose Lives Estates doe depend.

X1Recital that Cestui que vies have gone beyond Sea, and that Reversioners cannot find out whether they are alive or dead.

Whereas diverse Lords of Mannours and others have granted Estates by Lease for one or more life or lives, or else for yeares determinable upon one or more life or lives And it hath often happened that such person or persons for whose life or lives such Estates have beene granted have gone beyond the Seas or soe absented themselves for many yeares that the Lessors and Reversioners cannot finde out whether such person or persons be alive or dead by reason whereof such Lessors and Reversioners have beene held out of possession of their Tenements for many yeares after all the lives upon which such Estates depend are dead in regard that the Lessors and Reversioners when they have brought Actions for the recovery of their Tenements have beene putt upon it to prove the death of their Tennants when it is almost impossible for them to discover the same, For remedy of which mischeife soe frequently happening to such Lessors or Reversioners.

Annotations:

Modifications etc. (not altering text)

C1Short title “The Cestui que Vie Act 1666” given by Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c. 62), Sch. 2

C2Preamble omitted in part under authority of Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c. 62), Sch. 1

C3Certain words of enactment repealed by Statute Law Revision Act 1888 (c. 3) and remainder omitted under authority of Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c. 62), s. 3

Editorial Information

X1Abbreviations or contractions in the original form of this Act have been expanded into modern lettering in the text set out above and below.

[I.]Cestui que vie remaining beyond Sea for Seven Years together and no Proof of their Lives, Judge in Action to direct a Verdict as though Cestui que vie were dead

If such person or persons for whose life or lives such Estates have beene or shall be granted as aforesaid shall remaine beyond the Seas or elsewhere absent themselves in this Realme by the space of seaven yeares together and noe sufficient and evident proofe be made of the lives of such person or persons respectively in any Action commenced for recovery of such Tenements by the Lessors or Reversioners in every such case the person or persons upon whose life or lives such Estate depended shall be accounted as naturally dead, And in every Action brought for the recovery of the said Tenements by the Lessors or Reversioners their Heires or Assignes, the Judges before whom such Action shall be brought shall direct the Jury to give their Verdict as if the person soe remaining beyond the Seas or otherwise absenting himselfe were dead.

II. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F1

Annotations:

Amendments (Textual)

F1S. II repealed by Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c. 62), Sch. 1

III. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F1

Annotations:

Amendments (Textual)

F1S. III repealed by Statute Law Revision Act 1863 (c. 125)

IVIf the supposed dead Man prove to be alive, then the Title is revested. Action for mean Profits with Interest

[ X1Provided alwayes That if any person or [X2person or] persons shall be evicted out of any Lands or Tenements by vertue of this Act, and afterwards if such person or persons upon whose life or lives such Estate or Estates depend shall returne againe from beyond the Seas, or shall on proofe in any Action to be brought for recovery of the same [X2to] be made appeare to be liveing; or to have beene liveing at the time of the Eviction That then and from thenceforth the Tennant or Lessee who was outed of the same his or their Executors Administrators or Assignes shall or may reenter repossesse have hold and enjoy the said Lands or Tenements in his or their former Estate for and dureing the Life or Lives or soe long terme as the said person or persons upon whose Life or Lives the said Estate or Estates depend shall be liveing, and alsoe shall upon Action or Actions to be brought by him or them against the Lessors Reversioners or Tennants in possession or other persons respectively which since the time of the said Eviction received the Proffitts of the said Lands or Tenements recover for damages the full Proffitts of the said Lands or Tenements respectively with lawfull Interest for and from the time that he or they were outed of the said Lands or Tenements, and kepte or held out of the same by the said Lessors Reversioners Tennants or other persons who after the said Eviction received the Proffitts of the said Lands or Tenements or any of them respectively as well in the case when the said person or persons upon whose Life or Lives such Estate or Estates did depend are or shall be dead at the time of bringing of the said Action or Actions as if the said person or persons where then liveing.]

Annotations:

Editorial Information

X1annexed to the Original Act in a separate Schedule

X2Variant reading of the text noted in The Statutes of the Realm as follows: O. omits [O. refers to a collection in the library of Trinity College, Cambridge]

YOUR ELECTION CONTRACT. DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU AGREED TO BE YOUR FICTIONAL SELF WHEN YOU VOTED TODAY?

SPECIAL ELECTION DAY REPORT by Tetractys Merkaba Editor-In-Chief Mikiverse Law

ARE WE CREATING AN ENJOINDER WHEN WE VOTE BETWEEN OUR FICTIONAL AND REAL SELVES?

Have you ever paid attention to the electoral roll when you get your name crossed off?

You announce yourself to a member of the Australian Electoral Commission (A.E.C) and they cross out your name on the electoral roll & you vote. This marks you in the record book as someone who has voted, but, does it also mark your fictional self down as a voter in the Corporate election of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA?

Did you know that in the electoral roll, your name is spelt in the style known as Capitis Diminutio Media, e.g 'John DOE'?

Did you know that the candidates in both the House of Representatives and the Senate have the same style of spelling?

A real person spells their name, 'John Doe'. Your person, or, your strawman is spelt 'JOHN DOE'.

Does this medium status mean that we have created what is known as an enjoinder between our real & fictional selves to vote for the enjoinder between the candidates real and fictional self?

After all, you agree that you are this person of your own free will to a witness who asks you. You could've said, no, that is not me. Or, no, that is one of my tools, I am a sovereign being of light and love. Chances are, however, that you agreed to be that person when requested. If you wouldn't agree to being that person in court, why would you agree in this and other situations?

More information as it comes to hand.

THE ELECTION STORY WHICH WOKE AUSTRALIAN'S UP

CASE DISMISSED WITH CAUSE AND PREJUDICE JUDGE BOWS TO SOVEREIGN

CRIMES ACT 1914 - SECT 28 INTERFERING WITH POLITICAL LIBERTY

CRIMES ACT 1914 - SECT 28

Interfering with political liberty
 

Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise or performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall be guilty of an offence. 

Penalty: Imprisonment for 3 years. 

SOVEREIGN AUSTRALIA