NOTICE
One formally advises ALL INTERESTED AND NON INTERESTED PARTIES, that,
James, or James II, or King James, or King James II, or James Scot
Francis or any other partner, superior, employee, functionary, or
acolyte of his, are NOT One's King, or One's Governor General, or One's
royal family, or One's government, or One's Agent, or One's lawmaker, or
One's representative, or One's family, or One's
trustee, or One's grantor, One's guardian, or One's banker, or One's
provider, or One's Superior, or anything else that confers any type of
hierarchical relationship whatsoever with One.
One does not
recognise that James has any legitimate claim on these ancient tribal
lands and believes that any claim he makes pertaining to being King is
fraudulent in nature, racist and has no lawful or legal effect on One at
any time, past, present or future.
Evidence please. This man has not been charged with impersonating a Royal, nor with treason nor anything else that would dismiss his claim to be King James II. I believe the 'wet seal' actually endorses his claim.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that he hasn't been charged, doesn't mean that he won't be charged in the future.
DeleteI have no idea why you are referring to a wet seal, nor, do I comprehend what evidence you are asking for?
There are plenty of reasons why he shouldn't be my king. If you want him as yours, that is your right.
Wet seal on what exactly?
ReplyDelete