“On October 3rd 1213, King John, as ‘King of England Corporation Sole’ claimed autonomy over all the sovereign rights of England and assigned them to the Pope, who, as Vicar of Christ, claimed dominion over the whole world. In return, the Pope granted executive ship to the English Crown over all these dominions. In other words, the Crown is the chief executive and the Vatican is the owner, although, of course, the true owner is whoever controls the Vatican. This is why I keep saying that London is the centre of the operational level of the Brotherhood. Even greater power lies elsewhere, some of it in the Vatican, and, ultimately, I think, on the physical level, somewhere under the ground in Tibet and Asia. The people of America have been bled dry by this scam and continue to be so. Land of the Free? What a joke! And, people of America, your presidents and leading government officials know this. In turn, it must be stressed, the King John agreement with the Pope presumably gave away the sovereignty of England, also. And who controlled King John? The Templars did.” —David Icke; The Biggest Secret
Treaty of 1213 - The Beginning of the Lie
Once upon a time before the year
1066 the people of England held Allodial title to their
land. Not even the king could take the land for not paying a tithe.
William the Conquer came in 1066 and stole the Kings Title and took the
land of the people. From William I, 1066, to King John, 1199, England was
in dire straits. It was bankrupt.
The King invoked the Law of
Mortmain, the dead man's hand, so people couldn't pass their land on to the
church or anyone else without the King's permission, (modern day probate?).
Without Mortmain the King would lose the land he
controlled. The Vatican didn't like that because the King owed a lot of pounds to the Vatican. (WHY?)
(1). King John refused to accept
The Vatican's representative, Stephen Langton, whom Pope Innocent III installed
to rule England (religious or in fact?)
(2) In 1208 England was placed
under Papal interdict(?). Interdict means a prohibition.)King John was
excommunicated and in trying to regain his stature he grovelled before the Pope
and returned the title to his kingdoms of England and Ireland to the Pope as vassals, and swore submission and loyalty to him. King John accepted Langton as Archbishop of
Canterbury, and offered the Pope a
vassal's bond of fealty and homage. Two months later, in July of 1213,
King John was absolved of excommunication at Winchester, by the returned
Archbishop of Canterbury, Langton. On October 3, 1213, by treaty, King John
ratified his surrender of his kingdoms to the Pope, as Vicar of Christ who
claimed ownership of everything and everyone on earth as tradition.
Question 1. Where in the Bible
did Jesus give any man this kind of power over all men and land? He didn't. He
did not create a religion nor did he create the office of Pope.
Question 2. Can you have a third party break a contract between you and another person
under duress..? Don't those of you who are forced into a contract reserve all
your rights under modern UCC 1-207 and claim UCC 1-103?
The contract (treaty of 1213) was
between two parties. Now the Barons of England would not put up with being
slaves anymore so they took to the sword and made King John sign the Magna Charta. So doesn't this act of the Barons violate the
principle of natural law, when they
created the Magna Charta, as having no force and effect upon a contract between
two parties? Well Pope Innocent III, the other contracting party thought so,
for he declared the Magna Charta to be: ". . .unlawful and unjust as it is base and shameful. . . whereby
the Apostolic See is brought into contempt, the
Royal Prerogative diminished, the English
outraged, and the whole enterprise of the Crusade greatly imperiled."
G.R.C. Davis: Magna Charta.
Trustee of the British Museum. London. 1965.
The Pope, in order to introduce
strife in England and Ireland that would help him, used Jesus teachings to his
advantage that is verified in the Gospels by two of His Apostles. So St. Levy
(Mark2:14; Luke 5:27), alias Matthew, cites Jesus at
Matthew 10::34-36 and Luke12:49, 51-3.
Nothing reveals the antithesis of government and religion more clearly than
these facts.
Question 3. What did the
contract of 1213 A.D. create? A TRUST or CONTRACT. Only the two parties, the
King's heirs and the Pope, can break the contract. For the Trust /Contract
cannot be broken as long as there are heirs to both sides of the contract.
At this time in history
we now know who controlled the Kings of England and the land of the world.
For Now we have the Pope claiming the whole Western Hemisphere besides
Europe. The Holy See of Antioch ruled all the easterly side and the Holy See of Alexandria ruled the western side, so there
was a conflict.
(3) So, on with the
story. The King's explorers had come to America to claim dominion over land by
deceiving and murdering the natives, the American Indians. The King operated
under the treaty of 1213 and everything was going along okay until the
1770's when the bunch of rogues called the "Founding
Fathers" decided they wanted the benefits but not pay the taxes to the
King. They, being lawyers, and professional educated men, didn't know they were
still under the Pope's control? Their lies and fraud now would affect the
American colonies and the people who lived on the land. Those common people who
fought in the American Revolution were unaware that the 1213 treaty still ruled
despite the fact they THOUGHT the Magna Charta was a viable piece of work.
(4) The Declaration of Rights in1689 declared the Rights of the British subjects in England. At the end
of the English Declaration it stated at Section III " ...that should
any of the Rights just mentioned be in
violation of the HOLY ALLIANCE , (1213 Treaty) ...it is as if this
Declaration was never written". So we
know that the English Declaration didn't fly, so what makes you think the
1774 Declaration of Rights in this British Colony would work. Weren't these people doing the same thing as the Barons
did in 1215 A.D. to King John? A contract is a contract. Look at Article 1,
Section 10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution. Can anyone obligate a
contract? Were the "founding fathers"
trying to obligate a contract between two parties that still have heirs living
today?
Question 4. How important is the "ultimate
benefactor", the Pope, The HOLY SEE,
in the scheme of things? Move through history till modern times and pull
Public Law 88-244, which follows Public Law 88-243- the institution of the law- merchants Uniform Commercial Code. Are
you shocked that the Pope is listed in this Public Law? Doesn't the
United States have an ambassador in the Vatican? Why? Is it a government like all other nations such as France,
Japan, Spain or Brazil? The Vatican runs the world, it controls the British
Crown. Is it any wonder they separate man's Church and government? They
don't talk about the Lord Almighty's Church (government) do they.
(5)
"Organized churches" are given special tax privileges because
the Vatican dictates to the sixty United States
trustees through the trust document, the U.S. Constitution created by the 1783
treaty between the King, frontman for the Vatican, and Adams, Hartly, Laurens,
& Franklin who were operating for the King and not the people of America.
Look at Article VI of the Constitution for the United States for your answer as
stated in the "New History of America". (6)You see we are still under
the Pope who rules over all nations as he declared he did back in 1213. The
1783 Treaty did say in the opening statement quoted exactly as it
appears in olde English; "It having pleafed the Divine Providence to
difpofe the hearts of the Moft Serene and Moft Porent Prince, George the Third, by the grace of God, King of the Great
Britain, France and Ireland, Defender, of the
Faith, Duke of Brunfwick and Laurenberg, Arch-Treafurer and PRINCE ELECTOR OF
THE HOLYROMAN EMPIRE, & C. AND OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, . .."
(Emphasis added in caps &
bold type). Did you catch the last few words? This is from a King (man) who can
supposedly make no claim over the United States of America because he was
defeated? The King claims God gave him the almighty power to say that no man
can ever own property because it, "goes against the tenets of his church, the Vatican/Holy Roman Empire, because the King is the
"Elector of the Holy Roman
Empire’"
What about
the secret Treaty of Verona, made the 22nd of November,1822, which shows the
power of the Pope and the Vatican's interest in the US Republic. Here is part of The Secret Treaty of Verona.
"The undersigned specially authorized to make some additions to the treaty
of the Holy Alliance, after having exchanged their respective credentials,
have agreed as follows:
ARTICLE I.
The high contracting powers being convinced that the system of representative government is equally as
incompatible with the monarchial principles as the maxim of the sovereignty of
the people with the divine right, engage mutually, in the most solemn manner to
use all their efforts to put an end to the system of representative
governments, in whatever country it may
exist in Europe, and to prevent its being introduced in those countries where
it is not yet known.
ARTICLE 2.
As it cannot be doubted
that the liberty of the press is the most powerful means used by the pretended
supporters of the rights of nations to the detriment of those of princes,
the high contracting parties promise reciprocally to adopt all
proper measures to suppress it, not only in their own state but also in
the rest of Europe.
ARTICLE 3.
Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of
passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties
declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states,
those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their
own interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority
of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the
Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant
cooperation in their views of submitting the nations." Do we have a false God before us and worship him
and his church instead of the real Lord, Jesus and his government. The divine
right of kings exists.
Thanks Myki glad o read that here ,its no longer on scribd
ReplyDeleteYour welcome, thanks for the info, it is a pity that has happened. Fortunately, it is preserved here.
Delete