Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (37 min 13 Mb)
thanks for reading and listening to this weeks blog and audio on One of
the most false and corrupt tricks of the private bar guilds regarding
how they argue they won’t accept your forms, even when they appear to
perfectly comply to the guidelines and rulings they set forth.
words, you have a legal matter before a particular court, such as a
magistrates court, or county court, or district court or even supreme
court and you follow to the letter their instructions on how certain
forms need to be completed and when it comes to the day, the judge or
magistrate simply ignores your forms without any fair consideration and
it seems they are running their own race. So how do they get away with
Well, if you
have been listening to the past two weeks of Ucadia blogs and audios
you will know that I have been trying to get back to the most basic and
fundamental of perceptions when dealing with the private bar guilds, the
current political and rulings classes of society in making plain that
if the law is not equal for all people, then there is no rule of law.
Full stop. Period. No if’s or buts.
words, where there is no equality of law, you live under the rule of
tyrants, where might is right, and rule by force and fear. So any
claimed law that is issued under such a system is not a law, it is what
is called a dictat or dictate – a proclamation without valid authority
enforced by force, threat or fear that something must be obeyed.
in the case of almost 99% of council regulations are dictat or dictates
of a dictator that have absolutely no mandate, lawful basis of authority
and are simply enforced by blatant and unequal threat in the absence of
any rule of law.
week we made the point that if the adjudication of law means there is no
fairness, no equal rights, no good faith, no clean hands at arms length
and no presumption of innocence until proof of guilt, then there is no
justice. None, zero.
words, any sentence, order or edict by the court has absolutely no
moral, lawful or legal basis whatsoever, other than as a dictat or
dictate by a dictator to be enforced by militia and privateers who are
employed by such illegal and unlawful claims to enforce injustice.
demonstrated in the pyramid of rights or “jus” where the private bar
guilds have granted themselves extraordinary, unprecedented rights and
powers above all other parts of society thus removing any possible
rational, reasonable and logical claim there is any form of justice, in
such countries as the United States, Australia, Canada, the United
this is in complete contradiction to the claims of the private bar
guilds running for profit businesses as courts when they speak through
the media. They say justice exists, the rule of law exists and that the
people are in control through the democratic election of leaders. Yet,
despite such spin, despite such George Orwellian double-speak, the
evidence exposes such falsities.
and thirty rights created out of thin air by the private bar guilds in
the past two hundred plus years through their dictionaries and case
laws. Yet the most powerful of these rights, such as Jus Immunitatis –
the right to absolute immunity or Jus Dicere – the right to decide
whatever the law is are reserved purely for the private bar guild. The
evidence doesn’t lie and some day in the future, more and more people
are going to wake up and look past the constant fog of disinfo at the
overwhelming evidence to realize without the golden rule in effect,
there is no rule of law, without equal rights under equal rule of law,
there is no justice.
So is there
any hope? Is there any way to overcome when the tyrannical system
masquerading as democracy demands you front up to one of their business
offices masquerading as courts? Well, yes there is some hope. It is the
fact that if the people ever woke up out of their sugar-salt-hormone and
preservative haze they might demand a restoration of law; that as has
been shown when social media seizes on an overwhelming example of
miscarriage of justice, the system is exposed – so there is sensitivity
to maintaining the appearance of justice.
That is why I
have repeated over and over in recent weeks that one of the simplest
yet most powerful things you can ask with respect when going to any
court is whether the judge or magistrate will be hearing the matter in
good faith and without prejudice? As many of you have shared, some
judges and magistrates openly welcome the honest question and answer,
yet some judges demonstrate their inappropriateness for claiming such a
position by obfuscating and refusing to answer.
So there are
signs of possible relief and the internet continues to grow with real,
not mythical stories of people finding relief when judges and
magistrates choose to honor, what little law exists in court rooms,
instead of being pirates. To those judges and magistrates that honor the
spirit of law and the ancient ways of law, before the banks seized
control and condemned our societies to the matrix of insanity that
encloses it today, is say “thank you”. Thank you to all of you who
continue to prove there are good people in all positions of society and
all walks of life. Thank you for keeping the hope alive that one day we
will see a restoration of law and justice that reflects the intentions
of the founders of so many great nations.
In the mean
time, let no one trick you, confuse you, tell you the kind of falsities
that we described last week that the only reason you do not achieve
relief is because you are somehow doing it wrong, or that terms such as
person, or trust are beyond your comprehension or are dangerous or even
that people are getting big financial remedies from the system following
certain gurus. Let the lies stop. Let the disinfo stop. The problem is
simple – most people live in societies where there is no rule of law,
there is no justice, only the fake appearance of justice if you obey
without question the demands of the intelligentsia, the illuminati
class. That is why innocent people are going to prison. That is why
honest people are having their homes and possessions seized. Not because
they didn’t follow the yellow brick road – but because they dared to
question and the system decided to step on them with both feet, so set
an example- the old chestnut of fear and threat.
Next week, I
want to focus on possible answers when facing openly corrupt,
incompetence and dangerous magistrates and judges who do not care they
are exposing their own system. But this week, I want to focus on one
possible point of relief in reviewing a point of forms- what are forms
when we go to court? And how do the private bar guilds trick us into
creating defective forms, even if we have followed their instructions to
Why is this
important? And how might this help? Well for one, if it turns out that
we can dramatically improve the strength of our forms that then forces
the private bar guilds to openly break their own rules then that is
better than the automated steam roller. And for some, it might actually
mean that those judges and magistrates and clerks who have any remnant
of decency and honor and respect of law might actually dispense justice
in their own courts.
What is a form?
Lets begin by reviewing again what we mean by form.
The essential elements of a form
Lets begin by reviewing again what is meant by form within the Western Roman system.
The word form comes from the Latin word forma meaning “shape, appearance, mould, stamp, idea, kind and nature (of an object)”.
Universal Etymological English Dictionary by N. Bailey of 1675 refined
Form into more specific definitions being (generally) “fashion, figure,
shape or manner”; (in printing) “one side of a sheet (of paper)”; (in
philosophy according to Descartes and Newton) “the second principle,
which joined to man, makes up all natural bodies, or the essential,
specific, or distinguishing Modification of the Matter of any natural
By the time
of the Dictionary Britannicum of 1736 however, we see a growing
sophistication in the various meanings of form to several dozen
different meanings spanning wide variety of subjects including (but not
Philosophy) “is the manner of being peculiar to each body, or that which
constitutes it such a particular body, and distinguishes it form every
“the just disposition both of the terms in respect both of predicate and
subject, and of the proposition in respect to quantity and quality”;
“are those (forms) which are inherent in bodies, without anything
contributed thereto on the part of man, as the form of marble”;
(In Artificial) “are those (forms) which arise from human industry, as a statute (of marble)”;
(In moral sense) “a manner of being or doing a thing according to rule”;
(In Law) “Certain established rules to be observed in processes or judiciary proceedings”.
By 1893, the Andersons Dictionary of Law further distinguishes the legal definition of form into two primary meanings:
(1) Established method of expression or practice; a fixed way of proceeding; and
(2) The model of an instrument or legal proceedings, a formula;
So now we
see by the 19th century a definition which reflects a feature beginning
with the coup de tat against the crown of Great Britain in the takeover
of the British Empire and colonies by the Bank of England and subsequent
pseudo statutes such as the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration
Act of 1836 which began to list what are called as Schedules or actual
instructions on how information was to be prepared and presented as
this, the way information was presented in form was either by way of
variations of indulgences prepared by the Company of Worshipful
Scrivener Notaries of London and then copies made thereafter. Now, by
the 19th century, the corporation pretending to be the Crown of England
was dispensing with ecclesiastical form and making up its own forms. In
other words, the invention of style over substance.
By 1910, The Blacks Law Dictionary defines Form also in two essential definitions being:
model or skeleton of an instrument to be used in a judicial proceeding,
containing the principal necessary matters, the proper technical terms
or phrases, and whatever else is necessary to make it formally correct,
arranged in proper and methodical order, and capable of being adapted to
the circumstances of the specific case. [we start to see a few twists
in this definition.]
distinguished from substance," form" means the legal or technical
manner or order to be observed in legal instruments or juridical
proceedings, or in the construction of legal documents or processes.
definitions reinforce the change from substance to style that forms
that are valid are effectively defined as schedules or extensions to
statutes – being elements of legal style that must necessarily be
arranged in certain order for a Form to be recognized.
when we get to 2009 and Blacks 9th edition – guess what the definition
of Form is? There is none. That’s right, there is no formal definition
of form other than a direct reference to see definition S-1. Now what
is S-1, let me read it. According to Blacks 9th, Form is now S-1 and S-1
means “an SEC form that a company use and must file before listing and
trading its securities on a national exchange”.
words, by 2009, the only legal and valid forms in the United States used
by the private commercial courts on the private side are SEC forms.
Everything else is fair game. Incredible right?
people start using commercial forms like UCC, IRS and other forms? Hold
on a second and be very, very careful. Before we even answer that
question, lets have a look at the essential elements of a legal form
first and what makes a form private or public or foreign?
The essential elements of a form
mentioned earlier, the earliest forms created for courts and law were
variations of indulgences – yep the same thing that Martin Luther was
said to have fought against and succeeded in abolishing, especially in
that turns out to be the fairy tale version of history. Indulgences have
been alive and well ever since and arguably used more in countries that
are supposed to be protestant such as England and its colonies than all
Catholic countries combined.
Deeds by their nature are forms of indulgences. That is, they are
ecclesiastical instruments of solemn form and design. So are Will and
Testaments as are Charters.
such instruments contain the memorialization of sacred oaths, absence
of numbers and the expression of all items as long handed words, the
presence of key Latin Phrases, the clear demonstration of a prayer. Why?
Because such instruments formally create trusts according to the sacred
law of the Carolingians who founded the Catholic Church and later the
But in the
case of the Bank of England and the system since the 19th Century, a
less formal set of rules emerged according to valid “public” form,
1. Identity of the statute and code and jurisdiction
2. Identity of the authorized form
3. Valid body of the form
element of a valid form and its upper most heading under the streamlined
non-indulgence system of the bank internal paperwork was the identity
of the statute and code which authorized the form.
included the particular body politic involved. For example, the
original operating law defining the creation of affidavits in the State
of New South Wales in Australia is the Oaths Act of 1900, written as
OATHS ACT 1900 (NSW).
element of a valid form is the identity of the authorized form, to
distinguish between different types of valid form or schedules. In the
case of the Oaths Act it might be the word “affidavit” written in
capitals AFFIDAVIT to make clear.
Now, if the
form to be used is specified as a schedule, then the form should also
include identify to itself as the appropriate schedule such as (example
only) as to the 1836 Act of Births, Deaths and Marriages, you would list
SCHEDULE (C.) MARRIAGES SOLEMNINZED AT THE PARISH CHURCH… (of the 1836
form should contain the valid content as prescribed by the statute. So
lets repeat those three essential elements of valid forms since the 19th
Century under the bank controlled world pretending to be the crown:
1. Identity of the statute and code and jurisdiction
2. Identity of the authorized form
3. Valid body of the form
So how come
the forms we prepare are rejected by clerks, magistrates and judges? How
come the private bar guilds are getting away with ignoring our
How the private bar tricks us into creating private forms
In an ideal
world, if clerks, magistrates and judges followed their own rules, then
instruments created as valid indulgences would be honored as the
foundation stone of Western Roman Law. Yet as we demonstrated several
years ago now with the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll borne out of Leviticus
of the Holy Bible, there is no rule of law, there is no justice and the
private courts certainly do not recognize God, the Bible or any of their
foundation law openly and without a fight.
you would think that courts would not be so arrogant as to dismiss the
forms defined by statue of the body politic the Congress, or House of
Representatives or Senate of the people. Well, actually, courts are all
to willing to repudiate all authority except unto themselves,
demonstrating they are wholly out of control, without any respect for
even the appearance of law, unless forced to be held to account.
But to make
their commercial actions easier, the private bar guilds running private
courts have used recent technologies and growing awareness to their
advantage by tricking us into lodging private documents even when we
think we are following public documents.
One way the
private bar guilds get away with organized crime and corruption is to
sponsor and promote disinformation campaigns on the Internet and amongst
people within the truth movement, to distract, to diffuse, to confuse
and beguile. This is what has been happening for years, especially now
with the absolute insanity of people promoting UCC – what utter madness
in the promotion private forms and other diversions that have no
possible impact. Still, despite all the warnings, people take to
copying and pasting forms which have absolutely no logic, no sense, no
historic precedence, no meaning.
would people be so gullible? Why would people choose fantasy and magic
fairy dust over the reality of the situation we face? In any event,
people lap it up and continue to send in nonsensical forms such as
courtesy notices and other made up and ludicrous forms. The end result
is, just as many people are allowing themselves to be tricked into
serious trouble as ever before.
those even with discernment, the trickiness of the private bar guilds is
extremely high. Instead of hiding how forms should look, almost every
jurisdiction of private courts masquerading as public courts put their
forms up on the internet to download? Why? And what is different about
these forms compared to public forms?
Remember the first point about forms since the 19th century?
1. Identity of the statute and code and jurisdiction
What do the
private bar guilds trick us into doing on all the forms we send? Yes,
they convince us that unless it says right at the top US DISTRICT COURT
or HIGH COURT or SUPREME COURT or some other name, then the form is
that then do? Under what jurisdiction is that form ultimately and what
can a judge or magistrate do? That’s right, if it says the US DISTRICT
COURT or HIGH COURT or whatever cout that it is, then those judges and
magistrates have complete jurisdiction and they can completely ignore
the form and refuse to accept it without any consequences.
tricky is that? You follow their forms exactly as they state and yet
they ultimately have the power to decide whether they will accept your
form or not. This is not isolated, this is happening all around the
Using public forms to the public court
So what can
you do? Well for one you can return to the original public forms
defined by statute and never ever mention the court at the heading-
never give them the change to claim jurisdiction above parliament.
the court try and do if your form lists the statute that the public form
is given life? They will simply deny the form because it doesn’t fit
their own private rules and tell you it does not comply.
is on the private side. What about the public side? – the side that
defines the role of clerk by public statute, that defines the court by
constitution or public statute and the form by public statute.
private bar courts openly denounce public statute- denounce the public
laws- repudiate any last vestige of illusion that there is any justice.
Let them openly admit to corruption by repudiating they are public
courts that honor public statutes and public forms. Maybe, just maybe
they will start to change or ultimately the private Bar guilds will face
Remember again the three elements that constitute a “public” form.
of the statute and code and jurisdiction that give it form. Never
including the private Bar court to then give it jurisdiction.
2. Identity of the authorized form if it is a schedule or if it is derived from a schedule.
3. Valid body of the form.
And do not
be distracted by gurus that come and cut and paste forms together and
tell you that you can create a unique form by merging two statutes or
that they have come up with a better form.
Please do not be beguiled by the disinformation promoted by the private Bar guilds.
Let the people see
relief, not being tricked into giving away jurisdiction and using
properly constructed public forms we might just find relief. Either way,
we step closer to reforming the law and ending tyranny.
That is all
that I am covering with you tonight. I hope that you find this useful
and a reminder of how easily they try to trick us with everything.
Thank you for all those who continue to read, help and support Ucadia. Until be speak again next week, be well and be safe. Good Night.
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS
REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING
OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES,
EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW
HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF
CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU
MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: email@example.com