Wednesday, May 8, 2013
HISTORY OF BIRTH CERTIFICATE- HOW IT IS USED TO ENSLAVE POPULATION
Labels:
100% Australian Independent Media,
mikiverse,
Mikiverse Headline News,
Mikiverse Health,
Mikiverse Law,
Mikiverse Politics,
Mikiverse Science
SERVICE AND EXECUTION OF PROCESS ACT 1992 - SECT 18
Appearance to state address for service
(1) An appearance entered after service of the initiating process must
state an address within Australia as an address for service.
(2) The appearance is effective only if it contains an address for
service.
(3) The court of issue must set aside the appearance if, on application
by the party by whom or on whose behalf the process was served, the court is
satisfied that the address for service contained in the appearance is false or
misleading.
(4) Subsection (3) does not limit the court's power to set aside an
appearance.
(5) For the purposes of this Act, if the appearance would not have been
required to contain an address for service had the initiating process been
served in the same State as the State of the court of issue:
(a) the appearance is taken to contain an address for service if it
states an address of the person entering the appearance; and
(b) that address is taken to be the address for service.
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES. AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE POLITICS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT:themikiverse@gmail.com
Labels:
100% Australian Independent Media,
mikiverse,
Mikiverse Headline News,
Mikiverse Health,
Mikiverse Law,
Mikiverse Politics,
Mikiverse Science
Monday, May 6, 2013
CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 64B
Body corporate
(1) A body corporate is connected with a
corporation if, and only if, the corporation:
(a) can control, or influence
materially, the body’s activities or internal affairs; or
(b) is a member of the body; or
(c) is in a position to cast, or to
control the casting of, a vote at a general meeting of the body; or
(d) has power to dispose of, or to
exercise control over the disposal of, a share in the body; or
(e) is financially interested in the
body’s success or failure or apparent success or failure; or
(f) is owed a debt by the body; or
(g) is engaged by the body under a
contract for services; or
(h) acts as agent for the body in any
transaction or dealing.
Natural person
(2) A natural person is connected with a
corporation if, and only if, the corporation:
(a) is a trustee of a trust under
which the person is capable of benefiting; or
(b) is engaged by the person under a
contract for services; or
(c) acts as agent for the person in
any transaction or dealing; or
(d) is an attorney of the person under
a power of attorney; or
(e) has appointed the person as the
corporation’s attorney under a power of attorney; or
(f) is given financial, business or
legal advice by the person in the performance of the functions attaching to the
person’s professional capacity.
Partnership
(3) A
partnership is connected with a corporation if, and only if, the corporation:
(a) is a partner in the partnership;
or
(b) can control, or influence
materially, the partnership’s activities or internal affairs; or
(c) is financially interested in the
partnership’s success or failure or apparent success or failure; or
(d) is a creditor of the partnership;
or
(e) is engaged by the partnership
under a contract for services; or
(f) acts as agent for the partnership
in any transaction or dealing.
Trust
(4) A trust is connected with a corporation
if, and only if, the corporation:
(a) is the settlor, or one of the
settlors, of the trust; or
(b) has power under the terms of the
trust to appoint or remove a trustee of the trust or to vary, or cause to be
varied, any of the terms of the trust; or
(c) is a trustee of the trust; or
(d) can control, or influence
materially, the activities of the trust; or
(e) is capable of benefiting under the
trust; or
(f) is a creditor of the trustee of
the trust; or
(g) is engaged by the trustee of the
trust under a contract for services; or
(h) acts as agent for the trustee of
the trust in any transaction or dealing.
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES. AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE POLITICS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT:themikiverse@gmail.com
Labels:
'Australia is a Crime Scene' - Robbie Thorpe,
100% Australian Independent Media,
mikiverse,
Mikiverse Headline News,
Mikiverse Health,
Mikiverse Law,
Mikiverse Politics,
Mikiverse Science
Saturday, May 4, 2013
FLANO'S NOTICE TO THE BODY CORPORATE IN CONTRACT WITH THE VICTORIAN POLICE ABN: 63 446 481 493 TRADING AS SCOTT CHALMERS AGENT OF THE CROWN, ACTING AS VICTORIAN POLICE HIGH WAY PATROL OFFICER, COMPANY ID NUMBER: 33671.
crág : of the House of flánnghál-máille.
boonwurrong domiclie.
C/O- Mailing Address: 9 Fxxxxxxxxx Crt.
Fxxxxxxxxx.
Near. [3XXX].
Date: 3rdMay 2013.
Without prejudice
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent; Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal.
To:
The Body Corporate in contract with the Victorian Police ABN: 63 446 481 493 trading as Scott CHALMERS Agent of the Crown, acting as VICTORIAN POLICE High Way Patrol Officer, Company Id Number: 33671.
Sent on the 3rd May 2013 to Email: scott.x.chalmers@police.vic.au
Re: Case Number: CR-12-XXXXXX
Dear Scott.
In regards to case number CR-12-XXXXX, finalised in the Melbourne County Court under Judge CHETTLE on the 29 of November 2012 at 10:00 am.
In pursuant of section 100F and section 100G, of the police regulations act 1958 Victoria.
One
is of the asseveration that you representing the VICTORIAN POLICE, have
exceeded the time allocated within section 100G, to retain “Seized
Items” regarding Case number CR-12-XXXXX
Police Regulation Act 1958 - SECT 100G
Magistrates' Court may extend 6 month period100G. Magistrates' Court may extend 6month period
(1) A member of the force may apply tothe Magistrates' Court within 6 months
after seizing a thing under thisDivision for an extension of the period for
which the member may retain the thing.
(2) The Magistrates' Court may ordersuch an extension if satisfied that
retention of the thing is necessary-
(a) for the purposes of aninvestigation into whether a relevant offence
has occurred; or
(b) to enable evidence of thecommission of a relevant offence to be
obtained for the purposes of a prosecution; or
(c) for the purposes of aninvestigation or proposed investigation under
PartIV or IVA.
obtained for the purposes of a prosecution; or
(c) for the purposes of aninvestigation or proposed investigation under
PartIV or IVA.
- NOTICE TO RECLAIM ITEMS SEIZED.
PoliceRegulation Act 1958 - SECT 100F
Retention and return of seized things
100F. Retention and return of seizedthings
(1) If a member of the force seizes athing under this Division (other than a
thing that is the property of theState), the member must take reasonable
steps to return it to the person fromwhom it was seized if-
(a) the reason for its seizure nolonger exists; and
(b) the thing is not required, orlikely to be required, in connection
with any investigation or proposed investigation under PartIV or IVA.
(2) If the thing seized has not beenreturned within 6 months after it was
seized, the member must take reasonablesteps to return it unless-
(a) proceedings for the purposefor which the thing was retained have
commenced within that 6 month period and those proceedings (including
any appeal) have not been completed; or
(b) an investigation under PartIV or IVAto which the thing is relevant
has commenced within that 6 month periodand that investigation has
not been completed; or
(c) the Magistrates' Court makesan order under section 100G extending the
period during which the thing may be retained.
Take Note: “Seized Items” are now to be returned within 72 hours of the receipt of this email, Dated 3rd May 2013.
List of “Exclusive Items seized” Includes.
2x. Black/White Tribal Jurisdictional Registration plate’s of the binjareb Tribe of the Grater Bibbullmun Nation with the lettering of S0V – 001, and Under O.S.T.F. Treaty
(Original SovereignTribal Federation Treaty).
1x Nokia mobile phone silver in colour.
Furthermore it is also asserted that a “Notarised written affidavit signed by you under your full commercial liability and penalty of perjury”, of your and the VICTORIAN POLICE’s future intentions regarding case number CR-12XXXXX, To be included in the return of said “Seized Items”.
REGARDS .
crag flannghal-maille
Secessionist
Of The Sovereign Tribal Jurisdiction of Binjareb
Administer/Beneficiary
Of the
CXXXXXX FXXXXXXXX Estate.
Please note.
Failure to comply with the above “Notice” within the allocated time of 72 hours, via your actions thereon places you and THE VICTORIA POLICE in dishonour and invokes irrevocable estoppel, and thereby via your actions you will consent to liens against your property and the property of the VICTORIAN POLICE under tort for restitution for damages without recourse in any court One chooses to the value of $x,000,000.00 AU. And as agent of the VICTORIAN POLICE and contractor thereof agree to “Discharge” prior to any origination process filed, to any future actions or claims against the Estate of CXXXXX FXXXXXXX or Names deriving of the NAME written scribed or typed in anyway shape or form or the “One who Lives” acting as administrator/beneficiary known as crag of the house of flannghal-maille Secessionist, from the Sovereign Tribal Jurisdiction of binjareb of the Grater Bibbullmun Nation for “lack of Jurisdiction”. In the pursuant of public interest, justice and transparency this Notice may be placed in a public media domain including but not limited to the internet or other.
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES. AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE POLITICS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT:themikiverse@gmail.com
Labels:
100% Australian Independent Media,
mikiverse,
Mikiverse Headline News,
Mikiverse Health,
Mikiverse Law,
Mikiverse Politics,
Mikiverse Science
Thursday, May 2, 2013
HALSBURY'S LAWS OF AUSTRALIA 22 HISTORICAL FOUNDATION OF REAL PROPERTY IN AUSTRALIA. (c) LIFE ESTATES
[355-110] Life Estate
The smallest estate of freehold recognised by the common law is the
life estate. 1
A life estate is an estate which entitles the holder to possession of
land for the lifetime of the grantee2
or the life of another person (as an estate pur autrie vie). 3
In the case of an estate autrie vie, the person whose life determines
the duration of the estate is known as the 'cestui que vie' and the
interest holder in possession was known as the 'tenant pur autrie
vie' or tenant for life or lives. The cestui que vie, as the
measuring life of the estate has no interest in the land unless
otherwise granted an interest.4
An ordinary life estate is not an
estate of inheritance (a 'fee'),5
although in the case of an estate pur autrie vie, statutory reform
has modified this position. The right was always alienable, but only
for the duration of the life of the cestui vie.6
Where the tenant for life or lives predeceases the cestui que vie,
the estate of the tenant for life or lives may leave the interest by
will7
or if he or she dies intestate, the interest forms part of the
intestate's estate.8
In the Northern Territory and
Queensland, if a tenant for life or lives, or a person who is in or
comes into possession of land by, from or under the tenant or by
collusion with the tenant, wilfully holds over any land after:
- termination of the tenancy; and
- demand has been made and written notice given by the person to whom the remainder or reversion of the land belongs or the person's agent lawfully authorised for the delivery of possession of the land,
the person holding over is liable to
pay to the personkept out of possession of the land rent at the rate
of double the market rent for the land detained for and duringh the
time the person holds over or keeps the person entitled out of
possession.9
1See
Butt P, Land Law, 4th
ed, Lawbook Co, Sydney, 2001, [1001]; MacDonald C, McCrimmon L and
Wallace A, Real Property Law in Queensland,
LBC Information Services, Sydney, 1998, p. 157.
2As
to an ordinary life estate see [355-2070].
3As
to an estate 'pur autrie vie' see Holdsworth W A, A History of
English Law, 2nd
ed, Vol II, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1937, p 120. See also
[355-2090]. The estate pur autrie vie has been abolished in the
Australian Capital Territory: (ACT) Law Reform (Abolitions and
Repeals) Act 1996 (repealed) s 3.
4See
Butt P, Land Law, 4th
ed, Lawbook Co, Sydney, 2001, [1005].
5See
Bradbrok A J, MacCallum S V and Moore A P, Australian Real
Property Law, 2nd
ed, LBC Information Services, Sydney, 1997, [2.24], MacDonald C,
McCrimmon L and Wallace A, Real Property Law in
Queensland, LBC Information
Services, Sydney, 1998, p 157.
6See
Utty Dale's Case (1590) Cro
Eliz 182; 78 ER 439. See also Co Litt
41b.
7Originally
the right to devise an estate pur autrie vie was granted in the
(IMP) Statute of Frauds 1677 s 12. Now, in all jurisdictions, a
testator is able to devise all his or her real property: see
SUCCESSION [395-1060]. Specific mention of an interest in an estate
pur autrie vie as a devisable interest in property is made in:
(ACT) Wills Act 1968 s 7(2)(b)
(NSW) Succession Act 2006 s 4
(SA) Wills Act 1936 s 4(2)
(TAS) Wills Act 1992 s 5(2).
The wording of the statutes in the other
jurisdictions is broad enough to include an interest in an estate
pur autrie vie see:
(NT) Wills Act 2000 s 6
(QLD) Succession Act 1981 s 8
(VIC) Wills Act 1997 s 4
(WA) Wills Act 1970 s 6.
8See
[355-2090]. As to intestacy see SUCCESSION [395-840]-[395-2095]
9(NT)
Law of Property Act 2000 s 27
(QLD) Property Act 1974 ss 26, 27.
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS
REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING
OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES,
EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com
Labels:
100% Australian Independent Media,
mikiverse,
Mikiverse Headline News,
Mikiverse Health,
Mikiverse Law,
Mikiverse Politics,
Mikiverse Science
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
BEST A4V PROCESS?
This is a
very interesting A4V process that I’ve found. I’m pretty sure that it’s
from Jean Keating, since he used to talk about the memory of the
account. I like it best since it uses the lawful money language in the
endorsement. Because of that, it’s not just a discharge, like the Doug
Riddle and Winston Shrout A4V processes. Those require sending the
1040ES form which makes it a taxable event.
But since in this one you’re redeeming in LM, it’s not discharge but a SETOFF, so it’s quite different. Don’t know if it’ll work, but if it won’t, I don’t think anything else will.
Let’s not forget that corporate US citizens/strawmen AREN’T the creditors of the US gov’t, the American PEOPLE are. And if you’re VOLUNTARILY using FRN’s then you’re the strawman/debtor. But when you demand lawful money, then you’re acting as one of the People, i.e. as the creditor, since legal fictions CAN’T demand lawful money.
So the way I see it, US citizens/strawmen AREN’T entitled to setoff, only American People are, and in order to act as one of the People, you gotta assert your right to real lawful money, by demanding it.
"The United States, a private for profit Federal Corporation, is bankrupt and has to pay our bills
The united states “...is a corporation, a legal fiction that existed well before the Revolutionary War.”
Republica v. Sween, 1 Dallas 43.
United States Code Title 28, Part VI, Chapter 176, Subchapter A, § 3002;
(15) “United States” means, (A) a Federal corporation
1933 March 9, a bank emergency was declared by President Roosevelt because of the insolvency [bankruptcy] of the United States. Executive Order 6073, 6102, 6111, 6260; Senate Report 93-549, pgs. 187 & 594, 1973.
1933 March 9,“The new money (paper promissory notes) is issued to the banks in return for Government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and banker’s acceptances. The new money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other
property of all the people in the Nation.” Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congressional Record, 1st Session.
1933 May 1, gold was transferred [stolen] from U. S. Citizens to the United States by Executive Order 6102.
1933 May 23, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page 4055-4058) against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, conspiracy, fraud, unlawful conversion and treason. The petition for Articles of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee and has yet to be acted on.
1933 June 5, to mitigate McFadden's charges (and prevent being hung for treason), Congress passed House Joint Resolution 192 to provide U. S. Citizens the right to set off all debt obligations as the consideration (something bargained for i.e., an exchange) for the transfer of all the gold and property. It is against Public Policy [applies only to Congress] to pay a debt. Chap. 48, 48 Stat. 112 in the United States Statutes at Large is Public Law [applies to everyone else].
1950 Congress declared "bankruptcy and reorganization". Secretary of Treasury appointed receiver in the bankruptcy. Reorganization Plan, No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903; Public Law 94-564; Legislative History, Pg. 5967.
1973 "Since March 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency (bankruptcy)..." Senate Resolution 9, 93d. Congress, 1st. Session, Foreward. The president signs [renews] this every year.
1977 Oct. 28th, the United States as a "Corporator" and "State" declared insolvency. State banks and most other banks were put under control of the "Governor" (Secretary of the U. S. Treasury) of the "Fund" (I.M.F.). 26 IRC 165 (g)(1); U.C.C. 1-201(23), C.R.S. 39-22-103.5, Westfall vs. Braley, 10 Ohio 188, 75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W. 2d. 911; Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall 447.
1993 March 17th, United States Congressional Record, Vol. 33, page H-1303. Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House: "Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U. S. Government.”
It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress June 5, 1933 – Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.
The SUBSTANCE of the American citizenry, their real property, wealth, assets and productivity that belongs to them, was pledged by the government and placed at risk as the collateral for US debt, credit, and currency for commerce to function.
Under the 14th amendment and numerous Supreme Court precedents, as well as in equity, private property cannot be taken or pledged for public use without just compensation or due process of law. The United States cannot pledge or risk the property and wealth of its PRIVATE CITIZENS for any government purpose without legally providing them remedy to recover what is due them on their risk. Courts have long ruled that to have one’s property legally held as collateral or surety for a debt, even when one still owns it and still has it, is to DEPRIVE him of it since it is at risk and could be lost for the debt at any time.
The United States Supreme Court said that, the Constitution provides that “private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.” United States v. Russell, 13 Wall, 623, 627.
“Sureties compelled to pay debts for their Principal have been deemed entitled to reimbursement, even without a contractual promise… And probably there are few doctrines better established…” Pearlman v. Reliance Ins. Co., 371 U.S. 132, 1962
United States Code Title 31 section 3123 states that the US Government has an obligation to pay 'dollar for dollar' principal and interest in legal tender ALL debts accrued by the American people.
Those backing the nation’s credit and currency cannot recover what is due them by anything drawn on Federal Reserve notes without expanding their risk and obligation to their own selves. Any recovery payments backed by this currency (FRNs or Federal Reserve Accounting Unit Devices; FRAUDs) would only increase the public debt its citizens are collateral for, which an equitable REMEDY was intended to reduce, and in equity would not satisfy anything, for there was no longer actual money of substance to pay anybody. In other words, there is no actual money in circulation by which debt owed from one party to another can actually be repaid. Since 1933 no one has ever really been “paid” because there's been no money of substance. Every time we spend a Federal Reserve note (dollar) we increase the national debt by that same amount. Every time we send our bills to Treasury for the set off we reduce the national debt by that same amount. Federal Reserve Publication “Public Debt, Private Asset” says the national debt is owed to its creditors which is you and me.
We are operating under official Public Policy and Public Law set forth by the UNITED STATES when they confiscated all the lawful money in circulation in 1933 and it became impossible to pay any debts with publicly sanctioned money under the provision of the United States Constitution, Article One, Section ten, Clause one. In return for the confiscation of the lawful money, the UNITED STATES became liable to pay the debts of the people as fiduciary creditors [Trustees] of the people. Since all commercial energy in existence comes from the mental and physical powers of the living people, and not from corporations or government, it is these living people who are the lenders or creditors to all of society.
The government needed to account for how much commercial energy it owed each and every one of us, the ultimate creditors, for our contribution. The creation of the SSN accounts allowed the government to take our commercial energy and use it to keep the nation's economy moving forward in the bankruptcy, while at the same time not being guilty of fraud or theft. They borrowed against [mortgaged] our future energy thereby putting us at risk and they have to reimburse us.
They owe us, and therefore, we have a pre-paid account with the UNITED STATES FEDERAL CORPORATION since we are the creditors and it is the debtor. The SSN is to track our claims against the UNITED STATES and is the record of an invisible ‘trust account’ on the private side which they will never admit to publicly. The CAFR [Comprehensive Annual Financial Report] is the accounting that keeps track of the people's contributions and the earnings on those contributions and is currently estimated at 60 to 100 trillion dollars.
A4V (Accepted for Value) applies when a demand is made for payment with implied consideration. If there is no original wet-inked signed contract where both parties offer consideration, then there is no demand possible, only demand w/ implied consideration which, according to the UCC [Uniform Commercial Code], holds inherent risk to the issuer; if the instrument is accepted as consideration AND returned for value THE ISSUER IS LIABLE FOR THE BILL. That is where the “payment” comes from.
In the bankrupt economy whoever brings a liability has to bring the remedy. Whoever hands you a bill has to hand you the check to payfor it. Write the Accepted for Value verbiage on the statement and/or write a private issue Money Order on the coupon part of the bill and send it to Treasury to have it set off. The only way that utility company got built is that they mortgaged (borrowed against) our property and future labor compensation [only corporations have “income” so they can be taxed], so, everything since 1933 is Pre-Paid. There is no need for us to pay twice!
"All the property of this country now belongs to the state and will be used for the good of the state." FDR, 1933
The gov claims ownership of everything. They hold title to all property (land, homes, cars, etc.). They have mortgaged against our property and against our future labor, but where is the consideration? The only thing left to give back to us is the discharge of all so-called debts.
A true contract has “consideration” from both parties. Consideration occurs when the bank, credit card company, whoever, has actually offered you something and you offered to pay them back. Of course we know the banks, credit card companies, whoever, do NOT actually loan us anything! They use our signature to get funds (our own credit!) from Treasury.
Government cannot have a binding contract on you based on the rule of valuable consideration because everything government has, came from you to begin with. Therefore, no adhesion contract that identifies you as a public employee could be binding upon you. All licenses are adhesion contracts. They assume and presume we volunteer to be a government employee/Trustee and volunteer to be under their jurisdiction. If we take “advantage” of their benefits then they presume correctly, unless we establish our status through public declaration and get them to recognize and acknowledge our status. [see Dennis Craig’s docs]
The fact that they did not loan us anything can be proven with a VOD (Validation of Debt) which they never will, or can, answer to our satisfaction because they cannot show they actually loaned us anything. A copy of the payments you made is NOT validation of a debt “owed”. It does tell you how much to sue them for to get your payments back and add that to the original amount of your credit they borrowed when you took out a car or house “loan.” When they do not answer you by your deadline you default them and present copies of those letters to the court, and collect double or triple damages.
Publicly judges and politicians will not admit to all this because of the chaos they believe will occur, and that we would probably hang them for wasting our lives in meaningless jobs, when they were supposed to be setting off our bills!
When you receive a presentment [a so-called “bill”] in the mail there is a statement part where you can write the A4V verbiage, and a coupon part where you write the money order. There is no set wording, but see my examples below and if you want, change it, adjust it, but make it your own. I no longer think the A4V verbiage is necessary. All they want is the “money.” Know what you are doing! Do NOT stop making the minimum payment until you get a presentment that has credit on it. The birth certificate is your receipt for the contract or trust established with the government by your parents and which you take over when you come of age. You are always the Beneficiary but you also wear the hat of the Trustee when you discharge a debt (just don’t tell the judge that).
I have recently learned that the Trustee has “all the power” but I have not confirmed that. So, in open court (public side) you are Beneficiary, but in judge’s chambers (private side) you are Trustee when you A4V. Or you may simply write a money order on their charging instruments. Unfortunately for them they will not take in as much “money” if they were to warehouse you as freight in their prison. [Jean Keating says he wrote an International Bill of Exchange on a napkin to get out of jail and they gave him a receipt and thanked him]
When they drag you to their private-for-profit court which is just another corporation and where living men and women have NO business being, they assume and presume you are the Trustee who's job it is to shut up and pay the bills with your sweat equity. Establish your position BEFORE going to court by certified mail and when they don't rebut your position [they wont!] send them a default letter thanking them for agreeing with you and send them your fee schedule for being kidnapped (arrested), confined (jail, hand cuffs) drug into court, etc. If they want to fine you, order them to take care of it as your Trustee or you can just A4V and/or money order it.
I do the A4V and money order all in red ink. Most folks do but sign and date in blue ink. Its okay to get a stamp made but you may want to leave room for signature and date. Instead of a signature I just put By: in front of my printed name on the last VA medicine coupon I received and they credited the account. Some say the printed name IS a signature.
Accepted for Value
Exempt from levy
By: sign your name here
Authorized Representative, without prejudice [or without recourse]
October 20, 2011
Exemption ID # 123456789 [SS# without dashes]
Deposit to U. S. Treasury
and charge the same to whoever sent you the bill
Money Order October 20, 2011
Pay to the order of: U. S. Treasury
Pay: Sixty three thousand eight hundred forty nine dollars and twenty one cents, $63,849.21
Charge the sum to Vendor
Credit the memory of my account 123456789 [SS# without dashes]
By: First Middle Last Authorized Signature without prejudice [or without recourse]
Donor, Beneficiary, and Occupant of the Office of Executor/Administrator on behalf of
FIRST MIDDLE LAST 123-45-6789
Void where prohibited by law
Indorse the back;
Special deposit
Redeem in lawful money
By: sign your name here Authorized Signature without prejudice [or without recourse]
Send to:
1.ALL DEBTS NOT IN 2 OR 3
IRS Technical Support Division
C/o Treasury UCC Contract Trust
Internal Revenue Service
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20220
2.IRS DEBTS
IRS Technical Support Division
Internal Revenue Service
Stop 4440
P.O. Box 9036
Ogden, Utah 84201
3.DEBTS WITH LIEN(S)
IRS Technical Support Division
Internal Revenue Service
Criminal Investigation Division
Box 192
Covington, Kentucky 41012
You can also send to;
Department of the Treasury, IRS, Fresno, CA 93888-0102 [where one man has been getting discharge for 6 years. See file]
or
Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division, P.O. Box 510000, San Francisco, CA 94151or
Anna Medlock, DBA Operations Manager, successors or assigns, IRS, Accounts Management, PO Box 149338, Austin, TX 78714
Jack Smith says send it to the CID cause its their job to do the off set.
For years we heard that people had success sending to Anna Medlock (who may be retired) who was head of the set off “division” if there is such a thing.
Make 2 copies of the A4V'd “bill” one to send to the Vendor as a courtesy (maybe they'll do the right thing and do the set off) and one for you to keep. I send the original to Treasury. You may also send a cover letter telling your “employees” what to do, but shouldn't be necessary.
Have a notary send and receive for you as proof of service or you may send it certified or just throw it in the mail. I plan to mail to all of the first three listed above but I've also sent my VA medicine bills only to Fresno and every bill I've received since has a credit on it so I may just send to only one address. My friend Mike had a delinquent $800 AT&T bill he did the A4V and MO on and sent to San Francisco and it does not show up on his credit report. M. Rasheed had the Treasury discharge a $63K student loan."
http://sovereignwarriors.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=6194679%3ATopic%3A204225&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES. AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE POLITICS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT:themikiverse@gmail.com
But since in this one you’re redeeming in LM, it’s not discharge but a SETOFF, so it’s quite different. Don’t know if it’ll work, but if it won’t, I don’t think anything else will.
Let’s not forget that corporate US citizens/strawmen AREN’T the creditors of the US gov’t, the American PEOPLE are. And if you’re VOLUNTARILY using FRN’s then you’re the strawman/debtor. But when you demand lawful money, then you’re acting as one of the People, i.e. as the creditor, since legal fictions CAN’T demand lawful money.
So the way I see it, US citizens/strawmen AREN’T entitled to setoff, only American People are, and in order to act as one of the People, you gotta assert your right to real lawful money, by demanding it.
"The United States, a private for profit Federal Corporation, is bankrupt and has to pay our bills
The united states “...is a corporation, a legal fiction that existed well before the Revolutionary War.”
Republica v. Sween, 1 Dallas 43.
United States Code Title 28, Part VI, Chapter 176, Subchapter A, § 3002;
(15) “United States” means, (A) a Federal corporation
1933 March 9, a bank emergency was declared by President Roosevelt because of the insolvency [bankruptcy] of the United States. Executive Order 6073, 6102, 6111, 6260; Senate Report 93-549, pgs. 187 & 594, 1973.
1933 March 9,“The new money (paper promissory notes) is issued to the banks in return for Government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and banker’s acceptances. The new money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other
property of all the people in the Nation.” Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congressional Record, 1st Session.
1933 May 1, gold was transferred [stolen] from U. S. Citizens to the United States by Executive Order 6102.
1933 May 23, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page 4055-4058) against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, conspiracy, fraud, unlawful conversion and treason. The petition for Articles of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee and has yet to be acted on.
1933 June 5, to mitigate McFadden's charges (and prevent being hung for treason), Congress passed House Joint Resolution 192 to provide U. S. Citizens the right to set off all debt obligations as the consideration (something bargained for i.e., an exchange) for the transfer of all the gold and property. It is against Public Policy [applies only to Congress] to pay a debt. Chap. 48, 48 Stat. 112 in the United States Statutes at Large is Public Law [applies to everyone else].
1950 Congress declared "bankruptcy and reorganization". Secretary of Treasury appointed receiver in the bankruptcy. Reorganization Plan, No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903; Public Law 94-564; Legislative History, Pg. 5967.
1973 "Since March 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency (bankruptcy)..." Senate Resolution 9, 93d. Congress, 1st. Session, Foreward. The president signs [renews] this every year.
1977 Oct. 28th, the United States as a "Corporator" and "State" declared insolvency. State banks and most other banks were put under control of the "Governor" (Secretary of the U. S. Treasury) of the "Fund" (I.M.F.). 26 IRC 165 (g)(1); U.C.C. 1-201(23), C.R.S. 39-22-103.5, Westfall vs. Braley, 10 Ohio 188, 75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W. 2d. 911; Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall 447.
1993 March 17th, United States Congressional Record, Vol. 33, page H-1303. Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House: "Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U. S. Government.”
It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress June 5, 1933 – Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.
The SUBSTANCE of the American citizenry, their real property, wealth, assets and productivity that belongs to them, was pledged by the government and placed at risk as the collateral for US debt, credit, and currency for commerce to function.
Under the 14th amendment and numerous Supreme Court precedents, as well as in equity, private property cannot be taken or pledged for public use without just compensation or due process of law. The United States cannot pledge or risk the property and wealth of its PRIVATE CITIZENS for any government purpose without legally providing them remedy to recover what is due them on their risk. Courts have long ruled that to have one’s property legally held as collateral or surety for a debt, even when one still owns it and still has it, is to DEPRIVE him of it since it is at risk and could be lost for the debt at any time.
The United States Supreme Court said that, the Constitution provides that “private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.” United States v. Russell, 13 Wall, 623, 627.
“Sureties compelled to pay debts for their Principal have been deemed entitled to reimbursement, even without a contractual promise… And probably there are few doctrines better established…” Pearlman v. Reliance Ins. Co., 371 U.S. 132, 1962
United States Code Title 31 section 3123 states that the US Government has an obligation to pay 'dollar for dollar' principal and interest in legal tender ALL debts accrued by the American people.
Those backing the nation’s credit and currency cannot recover what is due them by anything drawn on Federal Reserve notes without expanding their risk and obligation to their own selves. Any recovery payments backed by this currency (FRNs or Federal Reserve Accounting Unit Devices; FRAUDs) would only increase the public debt its citizens are collateral for, which an equitable REMEDY was intended to reduce, and in equity would not satisfy anything, for there was no longer actual money of substance to pay anybody. In other words, there is no actual money in circulation by which debt owed from one party to another can actually be repaid. Since 1933 no one has ever really been “paid” because there's been no money of substance. Every time we spend a Federal Reserve note (dollar) we increase the national debt by that same amount. Every time we send our bills to Treasury for the set off we reduce the national debt by that same amount. Federal Reserve Publication “Public Debt, Private Asset” says the national debt is owed to its creditors which is you and me.
We are operating under official Public Policy and Public Law set forth by the UNITED STATES when they confiscated all the lawful money in circulation in 1933 and it became impossible to pay any debts with publicly sanctioned money under the provision of the United States Constitution, Article One, Section ten, Clause one. In return for the confiscation of the lawful money, the UNITED STATES became liable to pay the debts of the people as fiduciary creditors [Trustees] of the people. Since all commercial energy in existence comes from the mental and physical powers of the living people, and not from corporations or government, it is these living people who are the lenders or creditors to all of society.
The government needed to account for how much commercial energy it owed each and every one of us, the ultimate creditors, for our contribution. The creation of the SSN accounts allowed the government to take our commercial energy and use it to keep the nation's economy moving forward in the bankruptcy, while at the same time not being guilty of fraud or theft. They borrowed against [mortgaged] our future energy thereby putting us at risk and they have to reimburse us.
They owe us, and therefore, we have a pre-paid account with the UNITED STATES FEDERAL CORPORATION since we are the creditors and it is the debtor. The SSN is to track our claims against the UNITED STATES and is the record of an invisible ‘trust account’ on the private side which they will never admit to publicly. The CAFR [Comprehensive Annual Financial Report] is the accounting that keeps track of the people's contributions and the earnings on those contributions and is currently estimated at 60 to 100 trillion dollars.
A4V (Accepted for Value) applies when a demand is made for payment with implied consideration. If there is no original wet-inked signed contract where both parties offer consideration, then there is no demand possible, only demand w/ implied consideration which, according to the UCC [Uniform Commercial Code], holds inherent risk to the issuer; if the instrument is accepted as consideration AND returned for value THE ISSUER IS LIABLE FOR THE BILL. That is where the “payment” comes from.
In the bankrupt economy whoever brings a liability has to bring the remedy. Whoever hands you a bill has to hand you the check to payfor it. Write the Accepted for Value verbiage on the statement and/or write a private issue Money Order on the coupon part of the bill and send it to Treasury to have it set off. The only way that utility company got built is that they mortgaged (borrowed against) our property and future labor compensation [only corporations have “income” so they can be taxed], so, everything since 1933 is Pre-Paid. There is no need for us to pay twice!
"All the property of this country now belongs to the state and will be used for the good of the state." FDR, 1933
The gov claims ownership of everything. They hold title to all property (land, homes, cars, etc.). They have mortgaged against our property and against our future labor, but where is the consideration? The only thing left to give back to us is the discharge of all so-called debts.
A true contract has “consideration” from both parties. Consideration occurs when the bank, credit card company, whoever, has actually offered you something and you offered to pay them back. Of course we know the banks, credit card companies, whoever, do NOT actually loan us anything! They use our signature to get funds (our own credit!) from Treasury.
Government cannot have a binding contract on you based on the rule of valuable consideration because everything government has, came from you to begin with. Therefore, no adhesion contract that identifies you as a public employee could be binding upon you. All licenses are adhesion contracts. They assume and presume we volunteer to be a government employee/Trustee and volunteer to be under their jurisdiction. If we take “advantage” of their benefits then they presume correctly, unless we establish our status through public declaration and get them to recognize and acknowledge our status. [see Dennis Craig’s docs]
The fact that they did not loan us anything can be proven with a VOD (Validation of Debt) which they never will, or can, answer to our satisfaction because they cannot show they actually loaned us anything. A copy of the payments you made is NOT validation of a debt “owed”. It does tell you how much to sue them for to get your payments back and add that to the original amount of your credit they borrowed when you took out a car or house “loan.” When they do not answer you by your deadline you default them and present copies of those letters to the court, and collect double or triple damages.
Publicly judges and politicians will not admit to all this because of the chaos they believe will occur, and that we would probably hang them for wasting our lives in meaningless jobs, when they were supposed to be setting off our bills!
When you receive a presentment [a so-called “bill”] in the mail there is a statement part where you can write the A4V verbiage, and a coupon part where you write the money order. There is no set wording, but see my examples below and if you want, change it, adjust it, but make it your own. I no longer think the A4V verbiage is necessary. All they want is the “money.” Know what you are doing! Do NOT stop making the minimum payment until you get a presentment that has credit on it. The birth certificate is your receipt for the contract or trust established with the government by your parents and which you take over when you come of age. You are always the Beneficiary but you also wear the hat of the Trustee when you discharge a debt (just don’t tell the judge that).
I have recently learned that the Trustee has “all the power” but I have not confirmed that. So, in open court (public side) you are Beneficiary, but in judge’s chambers (private side) you are Trustee when you A4V. Or you may simply write a money order on their charging instruments. Unfortunately for them they will not take in as much “money” if they were to warehouse you as freight in their prison. [Jean Keating says he wrote an International Bill of Exchange on a napkin to get out of jail and they gave him a receipt and thanked him]
When they drag you to their private-for-profit court which is just another corporation and where living men and women have NO business being, they assume and presume you are the Trustee who's job it is to shut up and pay the bills with your sweat equity. Establish your position BEFORE going to court by certified mail and when they don't rebut your position [they wont!] send them a default letter thanking them for agreeing with you and send them your fee schedule for being kidnapped (arrested), confined (jail, hand cuffs) drug into court, etc. If they want to fine you, order them to take care of it as your Trustee or you can just A4V and/or money order it.
I do the A4V and money order all in red ink. Most folks do but sign and date in blue ink. Its okay to get a stamp made but you may want to leave room for signature and date. Instead of a signature I just put By: in front of my printed name on the last VA medicine coupon I received and they credited the account. Some say the printed name IS a signature.
Accepted for Value
Exempt from levy
By: sign your name here
Authorized Representative, without prejudice [or without recourse]
October 20, 2011
Exemption ID # 123456789 [SS# without dashes]
Deposit to U. S. Treasury
and charge the same to whoever sent you the bill
Money Order October 20, 2011
Pay to the order of: U. S. Treasury
Pay: Sixty three thousand eight hundred forty nine dollars and twenty one cents, $63,849.21
Charge the sum to Vendor
Credit the memory of my account 123456789 [SS# without dashes]
By: First Middle Last Authorized Signature without prejudice [or without recourse]
Donor, Beneficiary, and Occupant of the Office of Executor/Administrator on behalf of
FIRST MIDDLE LAST 123-45-6789
Void where prohibited by law
Indorse the back;
Special deposit
Redeem in lawful money
By: sign your name here Authorized Signature without prejudice [or without recourse]
Send to:
1.ALL DEBTS NOT IN 2 OR 3
IRS Technical Support Division
C/o Treasury UCC Contract Trust
Internal Revenue Service
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20220
2.IRS DEBTS
IRS Technical Support Division
Internal Revenue Service
Stop 4440
P.O. Box 9036
Ogden, Utah 84201
3.DEBTS WITH LIEN(S)
IRS Technical Support Division
Internal Revenue Service
Criminal Investigation Division
Box 192
Covington, Kentucky 41012
You can also send to;
Department of the Treasury, IRS, Fresno, CA 93888-0102 [where one man has been getting discharge for 6 years. See file]
or
Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division, P.O. Box 510000, San Francisco, CA 94151or
Anna Medlock, DBA Operations Manager, successors or assigns, IRS, Accounts Management, PO Box 149338, Austin, TX 78714
Jack Smith says send it to the CID cause its their job to do the off set.
For years we heard that people had success sending to Anna Medlock (who may be retired) who was head of the set off “division” if there is such a thing.
Make 2 copies of the A4V'd “bill” one to send to the Vendor as a courtesy (maybe they'll do the right thing and do the set off) and one for you to keep. I send the original to Treasury. You may also send a cover letter telling your “employees” what to do, but shouldn't be necessary.
Have a notary send and receive for you as proof of service or you may send it certified or just throw it in the mail. I plan to mail to all of the first three listed above but I've also sent my VA medicine bills only to Fresno and every bill I've received since has a credit on it so I may just send to only one address. My friend Mike had a delinquent $800 AT&T bill he did the A4V and MO on and sent to San Francisco and it does not show up on his credit report. M. Rasheed had the Treasury discharge a $63K student loan."
http://sovereignwarriors.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=6194679%3ATopic%3A204225&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES. AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE POLITICS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT:themikiverse@gmail.com
Labels:
100% Australian Independent Media,
mikiverse,
Mikiverse Headline News,
Mikiverse Health,
Mikiverse Law,
Mikiverse Politics,
Mikiverse Science
HALSBURY'S LAWS OF ENGLAND FIFTH EDITION 2012
87 REAL PROPERTY AND REGISTRATION
151. Determination of estate pur autrie vie. Any
person having any claim in remainder, reversion or expectancy may,
upon affidavit showing that he has cause to believe that the cestui
que is dead, and that his death is concealed, obtain an order of the
High Court for his production by the tenant pur autrie vie or his
assignee1,
and if such an order is not complied with the cestui que vie is
taken to be dead, and any person claiming any interest in remainder,
or reversion, or otherwise may enter accordingly2.
A tenant pur autrie vie who holds over after the death
of the cestui que vie, without the express consent of the persons
next entitled, becomes a trespasser and may be proceeded against
accordingly3.
The burden of proving that the cestui que vie is dead
lies on the person next entitled. In the absence of direct evidence
of death, the proof may be assisted by presumption of death4.
If the cestui que vie remains beyond the seas or elsewhere absents
himself in the realm for the space of seven years, the reversioner is
entitled to recover the land in the absence of proof that he is
alive5.
If the supposed dead person is subsequently proved to have been
living at the date of eviction, the tenant pur autrie vie who has
been evicted may recover mesne profits with interest in respect of
the period during which he was wrongfully out of possession6.
2See
the Cestui Qui Vie Act 1707 s 1 (amended by virtue of the
Constitutional Reform Act 2005 Sch 4 Para 6). Remaindermen may apply
notwithstanding that, in certain events, they are not immediately
entitled on the death of the tenant for life: Ex p Grant (1801)
6 Ves 512. The order states the place at which, the time when, and
the person before whom the cestui que vie is to be produced: Ex
p St Aubyn (1793) 2 Cox Eq Cas
373; Ex p Whalley (1828)
4 Russ 561; Re Lingen (1841)
12 Sim 104; Re Lingen (1841)
12 Sim 104; Re Clossey (1854)
2 Sm & G 46; Re Pople, ex p Baker (1889)
40 Ch D 589; 2 Secton's Judgments and Orders (7th
Edn) 1713. It appears that it is not necessary for the affidavit
required by the statute to contain a statement that the death is
concealed from the applicant: Re Dennis' Will (1860)
7 Jur NS 230. The order for production will be made if the
remainderman gives notice to the person in possession to produce the
cestui que vie under the staute, and the notice is not complied
with: Re Owen (1878)
10 Ch D 166. In default of production, a further order is made for
the production before commissioners or to the court (Re
Lingen; Re Pople, ex p Baker; 2
Seton's Judgments and Orders (7th
Edn) 1713); and, if this is not complied with, a final order is made
that the cestui que vie is deemed to be deemed to be deemed to be
dead (Re Lingen; Re Pople, ex p Baker;
2 Seton's Judgments and Orders (7th
Edn) 1713). As to extending the time for production see Re
St John's Hospital (1868) 18 LT
317. The court cannot give the tenant pur autrie vie the costs of
producing the cestui que vie (Re Issac
(1838) 4 My & Cr 11); nor will it give the applicant his costs,
at any rate if the respondent had good reason for requiring him to
come before the court (Re Pople, ex p Baker at
593). The statute applies to cases where the title of the
remaindermen depends on the death of the cestui que vie without
issue (Ex p Grant; Re Pople, ex p Baker);
to cases where the estate is for 99 years if the cestui que vie so
long lives (Ex p Grant);
and to cases where the person in possession has any interest
determinable on a life, such is permissive occupation, although not
an estate pur autrie vie strictly so called (Re Stevens
(1886) 31 Ch D 320). As to
procedure see further Daniell's Chancery Practice (8th
Edn) 1866. The remainderman has, of course, to give up possession to
the tenant pur autrie vie if, after the order is made, the cestui
que vie proves to be alive: Re Pople, ex p Baker
at 592. As to an estate for a term determinable on life see now PARA
119 note 3.
PARA
119 note 3
Fines
and Recoveries Act 1833 s 22 (as amended see note 2). The estates
specified as sufficient to confer the office of protector are 'any
estate for years determinable on the dropping of a life or lives, or
any greater estate (not being an estate for years)': s 22 (as so
amended). An estate for years determinable on a life or lives was
mentioned with reference to a form of settlement which was
practically obsolete before 1926. The first limitation was
frequently to A for 99 years if he should so long live, followed by
a remainder to his first and other sons in tail. A had thus no
estate of freehold, and his concurrence in a recovery was not
nessecary. This form of limitation was used in order to keep the
land in settlement as long as possible: see Bell v Holtby
(1873) LR 15 Eq 178 at 189. However, in effect, A had an estate for
life, and the Fines and Recoveries Act 1833 expressly made his
assent to disentailing necessary. An actual life estate was greater
than an estate for years determinable on life; consequently, this
was within s 22 and so a fortiori was a prior estate tail: Re
Blewitt (1855) 6 De GM & G
187. Thus, where there is a tenant in tail in possession and a
tenant in tail in remainder: Re Blewitt;
Carson's Real Property Statutes (3rd
Edn) 322.
note
2
See
the Fines and Recoveries Act 1833 ss 22-31. Of these ss 29-31
related to dispositions before 1834 and are repealed as obsolete:
Law of Property (Amendment) Act 1924 s 10, Sch 10 (repealed). The
Fines and RECOVERIES Act 1833 s 24 is also repealed; and ss 22, 23,
25-28 are amended by the Statute Law Revision (No 2) Act 1888.
3See
the Cestui que Vie Act 1707 s 5 (amended by the Statute Law Revision
Act 1888).
4See
Prudential Assurance Co v Edmonds (1877)
2 App Cas 487, HL; Re Owen (1878)
10 Ch D 166; Re Clossey
(1854) 2 Sm & G 46. The order has been made on evidence of
incurable illness of the cestui que vie when last heard of: Re
Dennis' Will (1860) 7 Jur NS
230. As to presumption of death see CIVIL PROCEDURE vol 11 (2009)
PARA 1100.
5See
the Cestui que Vie Act 1666 s 1.
6See
the Cestui que Vie Act 1666 s 4 (amended by the Statute Law Revision
Act 1888).
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS
REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING
OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES,
EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)