LAWYERS PROHIBITED FROM SITTING IN PARLIAMENT

By Undisclosed SOS Subscriber

In 1828, before the lawyers became numerous like fleas on a dog, or stick-fast fleas on a chicken, which kill the chicken, the Bible and the Imperial Acts arising from it were the LAW. Yes you may pass it on and thank you. Two party communism is still democracy, but Christianity, under a Sovereign, is the basis of our legal system, and while republics have all perished or are heading that way, this system, based on mercy, has survived since 1297. We have never lost a war against the Roman Catholics Kings or republics, or Islam. That is why they took Jesus out and killed him. The difference was in the individual heart of the soldier. The other were brave, but we prevailed. The email sent listed below.
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 46 Australian Constitution 
46 Penalty for sitting when disqualified Until the Parliament otherwise provides, any person declared by this Constitution to be incapable of sitting as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives shall, for every day on which he so sits, be liable to pay the sum of one hundred pounds to any person who sues for it in any court of competent jurisdiction. 
From (SOS Subscriber name withheld) 
To John Winston Howard Member for Bennelong. House of Representatives Canberra. 
15th November 2005. 
Dear Sir, 
BE WARNED: You are disqualified from Parliament by the Imperial Act attached to this letter, and are given a chance to resign forthwith, or face prosecution under Section 46 Australian Constitution. There are 32 lawyers in the House of Representatives, or almost one quarter of the House, and 22 (twenty two) in the Senate, and all held or could hold an office of profit under the Crown, as officers of the Supreme Court and High Court in their respective States. This means an automatic disqualification from being elected. Since employers are usually the only ones who can regularly access legal advice at the prices lawyers charge, the lawyers in parliament are a member of a class of people who receive a pecuniary benefit from the laws they pass.

This mischief was addressed and cured in this year, by an Act of the United Kingdom Parliament, of exactly the same standing as the Australian Constitution, the Imperial Act under which Parliament is constituted. This is the text. 46 Edward III AD 1372 
80. Lawyers and Sheriffs excluded from Parliament 
WHEREAS men of the law who follow divers businesses in the king's courts on behalf of private persons, with whom they are, do procure and cause to be brought into parliament many petitions in the name of the commons, which in no wise relate to them, but only the private persons with whom they are engaged; also sheriffs who are common officers for the people, and ought to be abiding in their office, for the doing right to every one, are named, and have heretofore been and returned to parliament knights of the shires, by the same sheriffs; it is accorded and assented in this parliament, that hereafter no man of the law following business in the king's court, nor any sheriff for the time that he is sheriff, be returned nor accepted knights of the shires; nor that they who are men of the law and sheriffs now returned to parliament have any wages; but the king willeth that knights and sergeants of the most worthy of the county be hereafter returned knights in parliament; and that they be elected in full county.

Now that you know about this enactment, which by reference to Section 143 (1) (a) , Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) is strictly proved once presented in any court, you can take no further part in any proceedings in parliament, and neither can any of the other 32 lawyers in the House of Representatives, and 22 in the Senate. It would appear that by reference to this Act, legislation passed recently is invalid, and was obtained by a fraud on the Constitution.

If you resign immediately, you will probably retain your pension and entitlements, unless the new Parliament strips them from you, however, for every day you continue to sit, you are liable to a penalty of $100. Your salary must also stop immediately.

Imperial enactments came to Australia in the Australian Courts Act 1828, and evidence may be found in the Australia Act 1986, in Section 11, that this legislation remains un-repealed. Much fraudulent legislation has been enacted by Parliaments that have had lawyers participating, and much work will need to be done to repair the damage. Most Courts created by the Parliament since 1970, are fraudulently constituted with your fellow lawyers as absolute power-mongers in control.

The Constitution, in Section 108, prohibits the States from repealing Imperial enactments, and Section 118 brings in all the Imperial Acts forming part of the law in 1900. Lawyers have a genetic fault in their makeup, which allows them to listen, but not hear. Section 128 Constitution prohibits Her Majesty ELIZABETH THE SECOND from assenting to such laws, without a referendum, because they are the matrix on top of which the Constitution sits like a jewel. The Imperial Acts are the foundation stones on which justice has been built.

Luke 11 Verses 46 and 52, of the Gospels that Her Majesty ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has taken an oath to uphold, as set out on the 1 Will and Mary C 6 (Coronation Oath) (1688) deals with lawyers, and the description is pertinent today as it was 2000 years ago. 46 Says: "Woe unto you ye lawyers, for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers." And Verse 52 says: "Woe unto you lawyers! For ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves , and them that were entering in ye hindered." The Parliament of the United Kingdom in 1372, passed judgment upon you, and it remains in force to this day.

By Section 61 Constitution the Governor General as a military man, and the Queen's representative in Australia is obliged to withdraw your commission, on being satisfied, on the evidence that you were a lawyer, before entering Parliament, because he is responsible for upholding the Constitution and the laws that are conditions precedent to its enactment, from the British Constitution. In Section 62 Constitution the Governor General has an absolute discretion to dismiss you, at his pleasure, and he must be displeased, at the dirty deeds you are attempting to have him consent to. He must reserve these Bills, under S 58 Constitution, and may suggest amendments under the same section.

Before the Queen may allow these fundamental changes to the Australian Constitution she must withhold Her pleasure until a referendum is held under section 128 Constitution.

This is the warning you are entitled to as a Christian from Matthew 
18 Verse 15, but should you not heed it, then you may expect further action promptly. 
Yours sincerely 
(Name withheld by SOS) 
Carbon Copies to: 
The Governor General of Australia 
The President of the ACTU 
The Secretary of the ACTU 
. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions. 
The Chief of the Federal Police. 
The Australian Broadcasting Commission. 
The Electoral Commission. 
Chief Justice of the High Court. 

---

A further email sent to Ian Harris:You might like to email Mr Harris also, and have as many as possible tell him what we think of lawyers. Click Here to send an email

Mr Ian Harris 
Clerk of the House of Representatives 
. Canberra 2600 
18th November 2005 
Dear Mr Harris,

I am delighted your background is not as a lawyer, but that you have followed an honest career.

You may not be aware of the destruction of the rule of law in New South Wales. It has come about because in 1969, the lawyers mounted a coup d'etat in New South Wales and took power away from the parliament and into their own hands. They did this in two ways. The first was enacting Section 6 Supreme Court Act 1970. That was possible because they had purported to repeal Imperial Acts in 1969, when in fact this is not possible. Section 108 Australian Constitution forbids it.

As a result many became very wealthy, selling indults, or licences to break the law to big corporations, taxing the little people to an obscene degree, and not taxing corporations. There is a plethora of self serving legislation, that lawyers have persuaded the Parliament of the Commonwealth to enact, which should never have been assented to. Not the least of which is the COMMON INFORMERS (PARLIAMENTARY DISQUALIFICATIONS) ACT 1975,which materially alters the Australian Constitution without the benefit of a referendum. It diminishes the Queen's authority, to act through and of Her Courts. It tends to bring Her authority into disrepute. By giving the High Court exclusive authority, a Court that has never sat without lawyers as judges of both fact and law, contrary to Section 79 Australian Constitution, the Parliament of the Commonwealth has cemented corruption into place.

Lawyers were banned from Parliament from 1372 AD, and should never have been allowed to sneak back into its sacred halls. The law against them being there is still on foot, and may be found in the law library at the University, in Chitty's Statutes. I append it. Hiding the law is a favourite lawyers trick, and unfortunately this law has been hidden, and some of this banned class of people have wormed their way into Parliament. They must be removed and peace restored to the community.

46 Edward III AD 1372 
80. Lawyers and Sheriffs excluded from Parliament

WHEREAS men of the law who follow divers businesses in the king's courts on behalf of private persons, with whom they are, do procure and cause to be brought into parliament many petitions in the name of the commons, which in no wise relate to them, but only the private persons with whom they are engaged; also sheriffs who are common officers for the people, and ought to be abiding in their office, for the doing right to every one, are named, and have heretofore been and returned to parliament knights of the shires, by the same sheriffs; it is accorded and assented in this parliament, that hereafter no man of the law following business in the king's court, nor any sheriff for the time that he is sheriff, be returned nor accepted knights of the shires; nor that they who are men of the law and sheriffs now returned to parliament have any wages; but the king willeth that knights and sergeants of the most worthy of the county be hereafter returned knights in parliament; and that they be elected in full county.

It is sedition, within the definition of sedition, in Section 24A Crimes Act 1914 for any lawyer to sit in Parliament as a member. Because they are excluded from Parliament by an Act that is binding on the Sovereign, reproduced above, and on them, they have been adjudged incompetent to take part in Parliament. There are a number of persons currently members of the House of Representatives not entitled to be there, and you should firstly consult the Governor General who has absolute jurisdiction over this particular area of the law, by reference to section 61 Constitution and by Section 62 has an absolute discretion as to which members can hold commissions. You should then order the security at Parliament house to exclude them from the House.

The proposed Industrial Relations Legislation is seditious. It has already promoted feelings of ill-will and hostility between different classes of Her Majesty's subjects so as to endanger the peace order and good government of the Commonwealth of Australia. Your fellow Clerk, Harry Evans should do the same in the Senate. Notwithstanding the Common Informers Act 1975, an indictment may be laid without the consent of the Attorney General, who is a lawyer and must be excluded, under Section 24E Crimes Act 1914.

I would ask that you do this promptly, and exclude the 32 lawyers who currently sit and vote in the House without lawful authority.

Yours sincerely (Name withheld by SOS)

Copy to 
Governor General 
ACTU Melbourne