Ex-police man, James Scot Francis ..... who proclaims himself to be "KING OF AUSTRALIA", as well as the 'continuation' of King James II, who was run out of/abdicated the English throne in 1688 is trying to create a new 'people's parliament' under his rule and authority. He is attempting this despite having no lawful authority to do so from anybody.
This man wants you to call him
"James Britanniarum Rex, Fidei Defensor Et, Victoria Dei Gratia" |
Am
I the only one who mistrusts a man who talks about a 'peoples
parliament'
whilst displaying symbols of conquest on his
website???
|
This
'proclamation' looks like an attempt to usurp the natural and superior tribal lore of
this land that has existed unaltered for at least 40,000 years.
THE COMMONWEALTH [of Humanity]-as
opposed to a Commonwealth of Australia or a corporate COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA. Is this an attempt at being some type of authority figure
without breaching the copyright of other quasi-authority figures? Why do some people
feel a need to rule over other people?
Monday, 25th of
February, 2013
By the King A PROCLAMATION
PUBLISHED BY
AUTHORITY: Whose authority?
This
has more to do with the English battle for control of the English
people/herds than anything that we need be concerned with. For those
of you that don't know, the removal of James II from the throne
completed the takeover of England by the Parliament of England. William and Mary of Orange were invited to come and 'rescue' England from the scourge of Catholicism, or at least that is how the official story goes. In reality they were offered employment by English Parliament as the King with the Bill of Rights being an employment contract. The new hierarchy was formalised a little over a decade later with the Act of Settlement 1701.At a time and date when the people of Australia see fit-March 28 is the date I am hearing-, they may open the peoples’ parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, yet subject to, and in accordance with, the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia. Notice how James is 'giving permission' as if it is his to give???
I've come to the attention of your Blog - excellent. Should you are your audience have any question(s) regarding the issue you've raised, I would be happy to answer them. You can email your King at his.majesty.king.james.11@gmail.com. Kind regards, James Rex.
ReplyDeleteNOTICE
DeleteOne formally advises ALL INTERESTED AND NON INTERESTED PARTIES, that, James, or James II, or King James, or King James II, or James Scot Francis or any other partner, superior, employee, functionary, or acolyte of his, are NOT One's King, or One's Governor General, or One's royal family, or One's government, or One's Agent, or One's lawmaker, or One's representative, or One's family, or One's trustee, or One's grantor, One's guardian, or One's banker, or One's provider, or One's Superior, or anything else that confers any type of hierarchical relationship whatsoever with One.
One does not recognise that James has any legitimate claim on these ancient tribal lands and believes that any claim he makes pertaining to being King is fraudulent in nature, racist and has no lawful or legal effect on One at any time, past, present or future.