By Isolde Raftery, Staff Writer, NBC News
When
Jonathan Frieman of San Rafael, Calif., was pulled over for driving
alone in the carpool lane, he argued to the officer that, actually, he
did have a passenger.
He waved his corporation papers at the officer,
he told NBCBayArea.com, saying that corporations are people under California law.
Frieman
doesn't actually support this notion. For more than 10 years, Frieman
says he had been trying to get pulled over to get ticketed and to take
his argument to court -- to challenge a judge to determine that
corporations and people are not the same. Mission accomplished in
October, when he was slapped with a fine --
a minimum of $481.
Frieman has been frustrated with corporate personhood since before it
became a hot button issue in 2010, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled
that corporate and union spending may not be restricted by the
government under the First Amendment.
At the heart of the high
court ruling was the argument that corporations -- because they are
composed of individuals – deserve protection under the First Amendment,
which guarantees free speech.
Frieman, who faces a traffic
court on Monday, plans to tell the judge that this isn’t about carpool
lanes; it’s about corporate power.
"I'm just arresting their power and using it for my service to drive in the carpool lane," he told NBC Bay Area's Jean Elle.
University
of San Francisco law professor Robert Talbot says Frieman’s argument
may not hold up because it steers too far from the intent of carpool
lane laws.
"A court might say, ‘Well, it says
person, and a corporation is a person, so that'll work for the carpool
lane,’” Talbot told NBCBayArea.com. “It’s possible, but I doubt it.”
In an
opinion piece posted to the
San Rafael Patch site on May 14, 2011, Frieman broke down his argument.
A carpool lane is two or more persons per vehicle, he said. The
definition of person in California’s Vehicle Code is “natural person, firm, copartnership, association, limited liability company, or corporation.”
“Just imagine what THAT courtroom scene’ll be like,” he wrote.
He
imagined what he might say to the judge: “Your honor, according to the
vehicle code definition and legal sources, I did have a ‘person’ in my
car. But Officer so-and-so believes I did NOT have another person in my
car. If you rule in his favor, you are saying that corporations are not
persons. I hope you do rule in his favor. I hope you do overturn 125
years of settled law.”
But before he can make grand proclamations, the officer who ticketed him must show up to court. Otherwise, his
ticket may be thrown out.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/05/16372432-california-man-says-he-can-drive-in-carpool-lane-with-corporation-papers?lite&ocid=msnhp&pos=2
ETHICAL DONATORS
AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS
SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO
KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment