COURTS AND HOW TO HANDLE THEM

Posted by Jaro on December 8, 2012 on the Sovereign Warriors
Here's an interesting approach to handling court, and explanation of the all-caps NAME. Basically according to this, one would first make a special appearance (I'd file it with the clerk also), then ask for verified complaint, and if it wasn't verified (sworn under oath by a man/woman), then conditionally accept the charges or plea, upon prooof of claim that there's a contract. Personally, I think it'd work better if you were an SPC (separated from your SM) or have something like the Buildfreedom Affidavit or Declaration of Domicil recorded in public. 
Oh, and according to Keating, we're DONORS in regard to the trust, and we have the power of appointment, which also means the power to fire someone who's administering our estate/trust, such as the judge. So that's probably what the firing of everybody in court is about. Either do that or appoint the judge a trustee, IMO. 
"Courts and how to handle them
When you go into court what do you find? Here are some general things to consider doing.
A position where the judge sits above everyone else. A fenced area where the Judge, prosecutors and accused reside. Today, this is NOT a court room, this is Judges/Magistrates chambers. Judges chambers are whereever they set them up to be, not just the office in the back. Court rooms would be for common law which almost never exists today. This is part of the deception. A "magistrate" not a judge, sees you in their chambers, where they can do what ever they want, without the constitution, your natural rights, etc.. Why is the judge siting in a raise position? Because from childhood we learn to look up to "authority". It's a physical/pschological phenomenon that most people default to seeing them as authority. Combined with the armed mercinaries, it's a pretty intimidating environment. They use words in double meanings just as their environment is an act, a stage, so their words are deceptions as are their practices. Really, the trial/hearing should be held in a sunken area like a surgeons theater where people look down on the judge and oversee the process. 
Always insist first and foremost to be "On the record in a Judicial hearing". This removes the magistrate from doing anything they want with you. If you feel forced into accepting the judges chambers, then you can inform them you are in judges chambers, all parties are equals, they have no political jurisdiction, you are a sovereign spirit present by special appearance and there is no contract. Oh an most important, when you enter the court room and they call your name, loudly proclaim that everyone present is fired and you are a sovereign spirit there by special appearance. Repeat that at any time. If the magistrate threatens (tries to extort your submission), remind them they are fired and you are in judges chamgers not in a court room! A judge can not practice law from the bench. They can't assign you council or otherwise. Feeling remind them they are fired and you have not and will not give them authority to make any legal/lawful determinations for you. Once presented with their offer of contract, you can state your willingness to accept their offer and negotiate a settlement with them. This ends the controversy and the judge is now only working out the settlement. Then the prosecutor will deal terms and you can agree on terms then ask then to please provide proof of the contract that obligates you to any of the "statues/crimes" listed. There is no contract. Also ask them who holds the bond for this transaction?
The main purpose of a judge/magistrate is to moderate the conflict between you and the prosecution. They will present you with their shopping cart of "charges' or items on sale. You will notice the dollar sign, dollar amounts attached. You are in a martial law tribunal. This is martial law, you are pressumed guilty. This is the summary judgement which holds the charges and the plea in one. It is pure, unadulterated fraud. They have no law, no authority, no contract, only deceptions designed to cultive your submissive acceptance that what is going on is authority over you and for you and the communities benefit (so they can make money).　
If you are in a trial situation and giving an unfavorable verdict and sentence you are being given an offer of a verbal contract. Promptly, loudly, clearly, politely refuse to accept it. Keep refusing to accept until you are asked what you will accept, then state "Dismissal of all charges with extreme predjudice.". You are in a martial law court, the verdict and sentence are an offer, don't accept it, don't settle for less.
Do not ever hire an attorney, if you are assigned one, fire them and if your are in court fire them immediately loudly and clearly. The attorney works for both sides, they are officers of the court, they are the ones that sign you into prison.
The false, criminal, fraudulent "Legal System" (not law, color or immitation of law) in operation today is "Law Merchant law".
Not a member of the body politics. Not in contract. Where's the contract, where's the law?
For the record, I accept your oath of office [to uphold the ORGANIC California and United States Constitution] , I bind you to it and remind you of your fiduciary duty to me, and you have my sovereign immunity while carrying out my kings business.
Where's the evidence? Where's the sworn deposition?
*********************************************************************************　
What is with this ALL CAPS NAME?
On your drivers license, social security card, credit cards, etc.. The all caps name is not style it is meaning. It is the SLAVE NAME the owned name, the property.
USA - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is not only a name change, it is a corporation and it is an indication of indentured or slave status. It indicates it is owned not free.
Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of – To use to ones own advantage."
Blacks Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows …
Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization) In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man’s status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications.
Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John Doe) – The lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man’s family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation [pride] of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom.Law, 144.
Capitis Diminutio Media (meaning a medium loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John DOE) – A lessor or medium loss of status. This occurred where a man loses his rights of citizenship, but without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights.
Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE or DOE JOHN) – The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.
Diminutio. Lat. In civil law. Diminution; a taking away; loss or deprivation.
Capite. – Lat. By the head.
As Black’s Law Dictionary explains, the full capitalization of the letters of one’s natural name, results in a diminishing or complete loss of legal or citizenship status, wherein one actually becomes a slave or an item of inventory. The method, by which the State causes a natural person to "volunteer" himself into slavery, is through forming legal joined, implied or stated, with the entity or legal fiction (name all CAPS). Of course, most natural persons wouldn’t willingly form such an unlawful but legally reductionist joinder, so trickery and obfuscation are used; and this starts when our birth certificates are created."
http://www.lawversuslegal.com/
http://sovereignwarriors.ning.com/profiles/blogs/courts-and-how-to-handle-them?xg_source=activity